Literature DB >> 15206694

An economic evaluation of intermittent cyclosporin A therapy versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of patients with severe atopic dermatitis.

Heini Salo1, Markku Pekurinen, Håkan Granlund, Marja Nuutinen, Pekka Erkko, Sakari Reitamo.   

Abstract

We performed a cost-effective evaluation of cyclosporin A versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis. The analysis was based on a one-year open prospective clinical trial conducted in Finland and showed that patients who received intermittent cyclosporin A therapy had on average 191 remission days per year, i.e. where disease activity was reduced by 50% or more. Patients receiving UVAB phototherapy had on average 123 remission days per year. All costs were estimated for the one-year period. Health service utilization of the 2 treatment groups was estimated based on the data gathered during the clinical study. Total costs were USD 5,438 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 5,635 in the UVAB group. Direct health-care costs were USD 4,935 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 3,124 in the UVAB group. The cost of a remission day was USD 28 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 46 in the UVAB group. In terms of direct health-care costs, the cost of a remission day was USD 26 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 25 in the UVAB group. Our results demonstrate that cyclosporin A therapy is similarly cost-effective as UVAB phototherapy in terms of total cost in the treatment of atopic dermatitis unresponsive to topical treatment. In terms of direct health-care costs, i.e. treatment and health services utilization costs, however, UVAB is significantly less costly, but side effects are frequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15206694     DOI: 10.1080/000155503100071666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol        ISSN: 0001-5555            Impact factor:   4.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Estimating drug costs in economic evaluations in Ireland and the UK: an analysis of practice and research recommendations.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes; Lesley Tilson; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Phototherapy for atopic eczema.

Authors:  Annelie H Musters; Soudeh Mashayekhi; Jane Harvey; Emma Axon; Stephanie J Lax; Carsten Flohr; Aaron M Drucker; Louise Gerbens; John Ferguson; Sally Ibbotson; Robert S Dawe; Floor Garritsen; Marijke Brouwer; Jacqueline Limpens; Laura E Prescott; Robert J Boyle; Phyllis I Spuls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-28

3.  Therapy of atopic eczema.

Authors:  Thomas Werfel; Christa Claes; Werner Kulp; Wolfgang Greiner; Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-10-06

Review 4.  Understanding economic evidence for the prevention and treatment of atopic eczema.

Authors:  T H Sach; E McManus; N J Levell
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 5.  Treatment of eczema.

Authors:  Christopher Chang; Carl L Keen; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.