RATIONALE: Many neuropsychological studies have documented deficits in working memory among recent heavy cannabis users. However, little is known about the effects of cannabis on brain activity. OBJECTIVE: We assessed brain function among recent heavy cannabis users while they performed a working memory task. METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine brain activity in 12 long-term heavy cannabis users, 6-36 h after last use, and in 10 control subjects while they performed a spatial working memory task. Regional brain activation was analyzed and compared using statistical parametric mapping techniques. RESULTS: Compared with controls, cannabis users exhibited increased activation of brain regions typically used for spatial working memory tasks (such as prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate). Users also recruited additional regions not typically used for spatial working memory (such as regions in the basal ganglia). These findings remained essentially unchanged when re-analyzed using subjects' ages as a covariate. Brain activation showed little or no significant correlation with subjects' years of education, verbal IQ, lifetime episodes of cannabis use, or urinary cannabinoid levels at the time of scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Recent cannabis users displayed greater and more widespread brain activation than normal subjects when attempting to perform a spatial working memory task. This observation suggests that recent cannabis users may experience subtle neurophysiological deficits, and that they compensate for these deficits by "working harder"-calling upon additional brain regions to meet the demands of the task.
RATIONALE: Many neuropsychological studies have documented deficits in working memory among recent heavy cannabis users. However, little is known about the effects of cannabis on brain activity. OBJECTIVE: We assessed brain function among recent heavy cannabis users while they performed a working memory task. METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine brain activity in 12 long-term heavy cannabis users, 6-36 h after last use, and in 10 control subjects while they performed a spatial working memory task. Regional brain activation was analyzed and compared using statistical parametric mapping techniques. RESULTS: Compared with controls, cannabis users exhibited increased activation of brain regions typically used for spatial working memory tasks (such as prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate). Users also recruited additional regions not typically used for spatial working memory (such as regions in the basal ganglia). These findings remained essentially unchanged when re-analyzed using subjects' ages as a covariate. Brain activation showed little or no significant correlation with subjects' years of education, verbal IQ, lifetime episodes of cannabis use, or urinary cannabinoid levels at the time of scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Recent cannabis users displayed greater and more widespread brain activation than normal subjects when attempting to perform a spatial working memory task. This observation suggests that recent cannabis users may experience subtle neurophysiological deficits, and that they compensate for these deficits by "working harder"-calling upon additional brain regions to meet the demands of the task.
Authors: Daniel S O'Leary; Robert I Block; Julie A Koeppel; Michael Flaum; Susan K Schultz; Nancy C Andreasen; Laura Boles Ponto; G Leonard Watkins; Richard R Hurtig; Richard D Hichwa Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Nadia Solowij; Katy A Jones; Megan E Rozman; Sasha M Davis; Joseph Ciarrochi; Patrick C L Heaven; Nicole Pesa; Dan I Lubman; Murat Yücel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jatin G Vaidya; Robert I Block; Daniel S O'Leary; Laura B Ponto; Mohamed M Ghoneim; Antoine Bechara Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Alexander L Wallace; Kristin E Maple; Alicia T Barr; Krista M Lisdahl Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jiansong Xu; Adrianna Mendrek; Mark S Cohen; John Monterosso; Paul Rodriguez; Sara L Simon; Arthur Brody; Murray Jarvik; Catherine P Domier; Richard Olmstead; Monique Ernst; Edythe D London Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Gerry Jager; Rene S Kahn; Wim Van Den Brink; Jan M Van Ree; Nick F Ramsey Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Max M Owens; Shannon McNally; Tashia Petker; Michael T Amlung; Iris M Balodis; Lawrence H Sweet; James MacKillop Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 7.853