Literature DB >> 15205664

Blood and marrow transplantation compensation: perspective in payer and provider relations.

James L Gajewski1, Mary Foote, John Tietjen, Ben Melson, Angela Simmons, Richard E Champlin.   

Abstract

The high cost per patient of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) causes this therapy to be the focus of much controversy, given the competing societal demands to provide all possible therapy to preserve life while simultaneously limiting global health care expenditures. Treatment and eligibility decisions for HCT often are heavily scrutinized by both governmental and private payers and not simply determined by physicians, facility providers, and the patient. In an effort to control costs, payers have administrative infrastructure to review resource utilization by these patients. Additionally payers have developed payment methodologies, usually in the form of a case rate payment structure, that place facilities and physician providers of HCT at financial risk for adverse patient financial outcomes in an effort to promote optimal utilization and selection of patients for HCT. As providers enter into such financial risk arrangements with payers, the providers need to understand the true cost of care and be able to identify predictable and unpredictable outlier risks for the financial consequences of medical complications. HCT providers try to protect themselves from excessive financial risk by having different payment rates for different types of transplant, eg, autologous versus HLA or genotypically matched related versus HLA mismatched transplants. Because at certain times in the HCT process risk is more unpredictable, HCT providers require different payment system strategies for the different time periods of care such as evaluation, pre-transplant disease management, harvesting, and cell processing, as well as short- and long-term follow-up. Involvement by clinicians is essential for this process to be done well, especially given the rapid changes technological innovation brings to HCT. Constant dialogue and interaction between providers and payers on these difficult financial issues with HCT is essential to preserve patient access to this potentially lifesaving therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15205664     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  2 in total

Review 1.  National Institutes of Health Blood and Marrow Transplant Late Effects Initiative: The Healthcare Delivery Working Group Report.

Authors:  Shahrukh K Hashmi; Christopher Bredeson; Rafael F Duarte; Stephanie Farnia; Susan Ferrey; Courtney Fitzhugh; Mary E D Flowers; James Gajewski; Dennis Gastineau; Melissa Greenwald; Madan Jagasia; Patricia Martin; J Douglas Rizzo; Kimberly Schmit-Pokorny; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Study 1102 heralds a new era in hematopoietic cell transplantation in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Challenges and opportunities in implementation.

Authors:  Erica D Warlick; Celalettin Ustun; Astrid Andreescu; Anthony F Bonagura; Andrew Brunner; Abhinav B Chandra; James M Foran; Mark B Juckett; Tamila L Kindwall-Keller; Virginia M Klimek; Daniel F Pease; David P Steensma; Bryce M Waldman; Mary M Horowitz; Linda J Burns; Nandita Khera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 6.860

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.