Literature DB >> 15205547

Cochlear implant candidacy and surgical considerations.

Noel L Cohen1.   

Abstract

Numerous changes continue to occur in regard to cochlear implant candidacy. In general, these have been accompanied by concomitant and satisfactory changes in surgical techniques. Together, this has advanced the utility and safety of cochlear implantation. Most devices are now approved for use in patients with severe to profound rather the prior requirement of a bilateral profound loss. In addition, studies have begun utilizing short electrode arrays for shallow insertion in patients with considerable low frequency residual hearing. This technique will allow the recipient to continue to use acoustically amplified hearing for the low frequencies simultaneously with a cochlear implant for the high frequencies. New hardware, such as the behind-the-ear speech processors, require modification of existing implant surgery. Similarly, the new perimodiolar electrodes require special insertion techniques. Bilateral implantation clearly requires modification of the surgical techniques used for unilateral implantation. The surgery remains mostly the same, but takes almost twice as long, and requires some modification since at a certain point, when the first device is in contact with the body, the monopolar cautery may no longer be used. Research has already begun on the development of the totally implantable cochlear implant (TICI). This will clearly require a modification of the surgical technique currently used for the present semi-implantable devices. In addition to surgically burying the components of the present cochlear implant, we will also have to develop techniques for implanting a rechargeable power supply and a microphone for the TICI. The latter will be a challenge, since it must be placed where it is capable of great sensitivity, yet not exposed to interference or the risk of extrusion. The advances in design of, and indications for, cochlear implants have been matched by improvements in surgical techniques and decrease in complications. The resulting improvements in safety and efficacy have further encouraged the use of these devices. We anticipate further changes in the foreseeable future, for which there will likely be surgical problems to solve. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15205547     DOI: 10.1159/000078389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  8 in total

1.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Qian-Jie Fu; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Clinical measures of auditory function: the cochlea and beyond.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Gayla L Poling; OiSaeng Hong; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.800

Review 6.  Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union?

Authors:  K N Talbot; D E H Hartley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Cochlear implantation is safe and effective in patients with MYH9-related disease.

Authors:  Alessandro Pecci; Eva J J Verver; Nicole Schlegel; Pietro Canzi; Carlos M Boccio; Helen Platokouki; Eike Krause; Marco Benazzo; Vedat Topsakal; Andreas Greinacher
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  Intracochlear Recordings of Acoustically and Electrically Evoked Potentials in Nucleus Hybrid L24 Cochlear Implant Users and Their Relationship to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.