BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a new infectious disease that caused a global outbreak in 2003. Research has shown that it is caused by a novel coronavirus. A series of cases is reported where polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on tears had demonstrated the presence of the virus. Detection of ocular infection from tears using the PCR technique has been widely used by ophthalmologists to diagnose infections for other viruses. METHODS: This is a case series report from cases classified as probable or suspect SARS cases. Tear samples were collected from 36 consecutive patients who were suspected of having SARS in Singapore over a period of 12 days (7-18 April 2003), and analysed by PCR using protocols developed by the WHO network of laboratories. RESULTS: Three patients with probable SARS (one female and two male patients) had positive results from their tear samples. Tear samples were used to confirm SARS in the female patient, who was positive only from her tears. The positive specimens were found in cases sampled early in their course of infection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series reported with the detection of the SARS coronavirus from tears, and has important implications for the practice of ophthalmology and medicine. The ability to detect and isolate the virus in the early phase of the disease may be an important diagnostic tool for future patients and tear sampling is both simple and easily repeatable. Many healthcare workers are in close proximity to the eyes of patients and this may be a source of spread among healthcare workers and inoculating patients. Ophthalmic practices may need to change as more stringent barrier methods, appropriate quarantine, and isolation measures are vital when managing patients with SARS.
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a new infectious disease that caused a global outbreak in 2003. Research has shown that it is caused by a novel coronavirus. A series of cases is reported where polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on tears had demonstrated the presence of the virus. Detection of ocular infection from tears using the PCR technique has been widely used by ophthalmologists to diagnose infections for other viruses. METHODS: This is a case series report from cases classified as probable or suspect SARS cases. Tear samples were collected from 36 consecutive patients who were suspected of having SARS in Singapore over a period of 12 days (7-18 April 2003), and analysed by PCR using protocols developed by the WHO network of laboratories. RESULTS: Three patients with probable SARS (one female and two male patients) had positive results from their tear samples. Tear samples were used to confirm SARS in the female patient, who was positive only from her tears. The positive specimens were found in cases sampled early in their course of infection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series reported with the detection of the SARS coronavirus from tears, and has important implications for the practice of ophthalmology and medicine. The ability to detect and isolate the virus in the early phase of the disease may be an important diagnostic tool for future patients and tear sampling is both simple and easily repeatable. Many healthcare workers are in close proximity to the eyes of patients and this may be a source of spread among healthcare workers and inoculating patients. Ophthalmic practices may need to change as more stringent barrier methods, appropriate quarantine, and isolation measures are vital when managing patients with SARS.
Authors: Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan M Poutanen; Donald E Low; Bonnie Henry; Sandy Finkelstein; David Rose; Karen Green; Raymond Tellier; Ryan Draker; Dena Adachi; Melissa Ayers; Adrienne K Chan; Danuta M Skowronski; Irving Salit; Andrew E Simor; Arthur S Slutsky; Patrick W Doyle; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Robert C Brunham; Allison J McGeer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Koizumi; K Nishida; W Adachi; M Tei; Y Honma; A Dota; C Sotozono; N Yokoi; S Yamamoto; S Kinoshita Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: C E Willoughby; K Baker; S B Kaye; P Carey; N O'Donnell; A Field; L Longman; R Bucknall; C A Hart Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: B De Simone; E Chouillard; S Di Saverio; L Pagani; M Sartelli; W L Biffl; F Coccolini; A Pieri; M Khan; G Borzellino; F C Campanile; L Ansaloni; F Catena Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Jasper F W Chan; Susanna K P Lau; Kelvin K W To; Vincent C C Cheng; Patrick C Y Woo; Kwok-Yung Yuen Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Alasdair Kennedy FRCOphth; Jessica G Shantha; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Lisa J Faia; Caleb Hartley; Sanjana Kuthyar; Thomas A Albini; Henry Wu; James Chodosh; Daniel S W Ting; Steven Yeh Journal: J Vitreoretin Dis Date: 2020-07-27
Authors: Daniel L Chao; Jayanth Sridhar; Ajay E Kuriyan; Theodore Leng; Brad P Barnett; Aaron F Carlin; Charles C Wykoff; Stephen Gayer; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Yoshihiro Yonekawa; Amani A Fawzi; Audina M Berrocal; Steven Yeh; Daniel Ting; Yasha Modi; David N Zacks; Nicholas Yannuzzi; Natalie A Afshari; Timothy Murray Journal: J Vitreoretin Dis Date: 2020-07-27