BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lesions revealed by pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may not progress to infarction, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or DWI thresholds for tissue viability may exist. We evaluated the evolution of abnormal DWI findings in patients with acute stroke who underwent thrombolysis. METHODS: Sixteen patients with acute occlusion of the anterior circulation underwent DWI followed by intra-arterial thrombolysis; follow-up CT or MR imaging was performed after reperfusion therapy. Lesion volumes were measured on all images. In three patients with abnormal DWI findings that appeared normal at follow-up, ADC values, ADC ratios, and DWI ratios were obtained on a section-by-section basis in the DWI-hyperintense regions that were either abnormal or normal at follow-up. RESULTS: In three patients, part of the DWI-hyperintense tissue appeared normal and part appeared abnormal at follow-up imaging. In one of these patients, the lesion decreased by -35.6%. In the other two, lesion growth appeared in regions that appeared normal at initial DWI: in one, the overall change in size was -2.4%, and in the other, the lesion increased by 89.8%. Respective mean changes at follow-up in normal-appearing and abnormal-appearing regions were: ADC, 731.7 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s and 650.4 x 10(-6) mm (2)/s; ADC ratio, 0.92 and 0.78; and DWI ratio, 1.16 and 1.32 (P <.001 for all measures). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute stroke who undergo intra-arterial thrombolysis, most abnormal, pretreatment DWI findings indicate eventual infarction. In 19% of the patients described herein, DWI-hyperintense regions appeared normal at follow-up. ADC values, ADC ratios, and DWI ratios may be useful in identifying the portion of abnormal tissue that is potentially salvageable after reperfusion therapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lesions revealed by pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may not progress to infarction, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or DWI thresholds for tissue viability may exist. We evaluated the evolution of abnormal DWI findings in patients with acute stroke who underwent thrombolysis. METHODS: Sixteen patients with acute occlusion of the anterior circulation underwent DWI followed by intra-arterial thrombolysis; follow-up CT or MR imaging was performed after reperfusion therapy. Lesion volumes were measured on all images. In three patients with abnormal DWI findings that appeared normal at follow-up, ADC values, ADC ratios, and DWI ratios were obtained on a section-by-section basis in the DWI-hyperintense regions that were either abnormal or normal at follow-up. RESULTS: In three patients, part of the DWI-hyperintense tissue appeared normal and part appeared abnormal at follow-up imaging. In one of these patients, the lesion decreased by -35.6%. In the other two, lesion growth appeared in regions that appeared normal at initial DWI: in one, the overall change in size was -2.4%, and in the other, the lesion increased by 89.8%. Respective mean changes at follow-up in normal-appearing and abnormal-appearing regions were: ADC, 731.7 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s and 650.4 x 10(-6) mm (2)/s; ADC ratio, 0.92 and 0.78; and DWI ratio, 1.16 and 1.32 (P <.001 for all measures). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute stroke who undergo intra-arterial thrombolysis, most abnormal, pretreatment DWI findings indicate eventual infarction. In 19% of the patients described herein, DWI-hyperintense regions appeared normal at follow-up. ADC values, ADC ratios, and DWI ratios may be useful in identifying the portion of abnormal tissue that is potentially salvageable after reperfusion therapy.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark W Parsons; P Alan Barber; Jonathon Chalk; David G Darby; Stephen Rose; Patricia M Desmond; Richard P Gerraty; Brian M Tress; Peter M Wright; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: P A Barber; D G Darby; P M Desmond; Q Yang; R P Gerraty; D Jolley; G A Donnan; B M Tress; S M Davis Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Osama O Zaidat; Jose I Suarez; Concepcion Santillan; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Robert W Tarr; Vanessa H Paras; Warren R Selman; Dennis M D Landis Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: R G González; P W Schaefer; F S Buonanno; L H Schwamm; R F Budzik; G Rordorf; B Wang; A G Sorensen; W J Koroshetz Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K O Lövblad; H J Laubach; A E Baird; F Curtin; G Schlaug; R R Edelman; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Daniel Sanák; Vladimír Nosál'; David Horák; Andrea Bártková; Kamil Zelenák; Roman Herzig; Jirí Bucil; David Skoloudík; Stanislav Burval; Viera Cisariková; Ivanka Vlachová; Martin Köcher; Jana Zapletalová; Egon Kurca; Petr Kanovský Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Clinton D Morgan; Marcus Stephens; Scott L Zuckerman; Magarya S Waitara; Peter J Morone; Michael C Dewan; J Mocco Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Roland Faigle; Amy W Wozniak; Elisabeth B Marsh; Rafael H Llinas; Victor C Urrutia Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-10-26 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Benjamin Pulli; Pamela W Schaefer; Reza Hakimelahi; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Michael H Lev; Joshua A Hirsch; R Gilberto González; Albert J Yoo Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Arash Meshksar; David S Liebeskind; Danny J J Wang; Benjamin M Ellingson; Noriko Salamon; Juan Pablo Villablanca Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Arash Meshksar; David S Liebeskind; Bruce M Coull; Elizabeth A Krupinski; J Pablo Villablanca Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 7.914