Literature DB >> 15205054

Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.

Oliver Eulenstein1, Duhong Chen, J Gordon Burleigh, David Fernández-Baca, Michael J Sanderson.   

Abstract

Supertree methods are used to assemble separate phylogenetic trees with shared taxa into larger trees (supertrees) in an effort to construct more comprehensive phylogenetic hypotheses. In spite of much recent interest in supertrees, there are still few methods for supertree construction. The flip supertree problem is an error correction approach that seeks to find a minimum number of changes (flips) to the matrix representation of the set of input trees to resolve their incompatibilities. A previous flip supertree algorithm was limited to finding exact solutions and was only feasible for small input trees. We developed a heuristic algorithm for the flip supertree problem suitable for much larger input trees. We used a series of 48- and 96-taxon simulations to compare supertrees constructed with the flip supertree heuristic algorithm with supertrees constructed using other approaches, including MinCut (MC), modified MC (MMC), and matrix representation with parsimony (MRP). Flip supertrees are generally far more accurate than supertrees constructed using MC or MMC algorithms and are at least as accurate as supertrees built with MRP. The flip supertree method is therefore a viable alternative to other supertree methods when the number of taxa is large.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15205054     DOI: 10.1080/10635150490423719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  14 in total

1.  Many hexapod groups originated earlier and withstood extinction events better than previously realized: inferences from supertrees.

Authors:  Robert B Davis; Sandra L Baldauf; Peter J Mayhew
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.

Authors:  Eliran Avni; Zahi Yona; Reuven Cohen; Sagi Snir
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  SuperTriplets: a triplet-based supertree approach to phylogenomics.

Authors:  Vincent Ranwez; Alexis Criscuolo; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Triplet supertree heuristics for the tree of life.

Authors:  Harris T Lin; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Accuracy of phylogeny reconstruction methods combining overlapping gene data sets.

Authors:  Anne Kupczok; Heiko A Schmidt; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 1.405

7.  Polynomial supertree methods revisited.

Authors:  Malte Brinkmeyer; Thasso Griebel; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-21

8.  Do orthologous gene phylogenies really support tree-thinking?

Authors:  E Bapteste; E Susko; J Leigh; D MacLeod; R L Charlebois; W F Doolittle
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.

Authors:  M Shel Swenson; François Barbançon; Tandy Warnow; C Randal Linder
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.

Authors:  Duhong Chen; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca; J Gordon Burleigh
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 1.625

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.