Literature DB >> 15204673

French field experience with buprenorphine.

Marc Auriacombe1, Mélina Fatséas, Jacques Dubernet, Jean-Pierre Daulouède, Jean Tignol.   

Abstract

In most European countries, methadone treatment is provided to only 20-30% of opiate abusers who need treatment due to regulations and concerns about safety. To address this need in France, all registered medical doctors since 1995 have been allowed to prescribe buprenorphine (BUP) without any special education or licensing. This led to treating approximately 65,000 patients per year with BUP, about ten times more than with more restrictive methadone policies. French physician compensation mechanisms, pharmacy services, and medical insurance funding all minimized barriers to BUP treatment. About 20% of all physicians in France are using BUP to treat about half of the estimated 150,000 problem heroin users. Daily supervised dosing by a pharmacist for the first six months resulted in significantly better treatment retention (80% vs 46%) and lower heroin use. Intravenous diversion of BUP may occur in up to 20% of BUP patients and has led to various infections and relatively rare overdoses in combination with sedatives. Opiate overdose deaths have declined substantially (by 79%) since BUP was introduced in 1995. Newborn opiate withdrawal in mothers treated with buprenorphine compared to methadone was reported to be less frequent, less severe, and of shorter duration. Although some of the public health benefits seen during the time of buprenorphine expansion in France might be contingent upon characteristics of the French health and social services system, the French model raises questions about the value of tight regulations on prescribing BUP imposed by many countries throughout the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204673     DOI: 10.1080/10550490490440780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Addict        ISSN: 1055-0496


  68 in total

1.  Intravenous misuse of buprenorphine: characteristics and extent among patients undergoing drug maintenance therapy.

Authors:  Enrico Moratti; Hamid Kashanpour; Tiziana Lombardelli; Maria Maisto
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Why we object to NAOMI. Heroin maintenance in Canada.

Authors:  Meldon Kahan; Anita Srivastava; Kay Shen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cocaine and opioid use during pregnancy: prevalence and management.

Authors:  Chaya G Bhuvaneswar; Grace Chang; Lucy A Epstein; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Office-based maintenance treatment of opioid dependence: how does it compare with traditional approaches?

Authors:  Erik W Gunderson; David A Fiellin
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  HIV treatment access and scale-up for delivery of opiate substitution therapy with buprenorphine for IDUs in Ukraine--programme description and policy implications.

Authors:  R Douglas Bruce; Sergey Dvoryak; Laurie Sylla; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2007-02-05

Review 6.  The pharmacological treatment of opioid addiction--a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Philipp Lobmaier; Michael Gossop; Helge Waal; Jorgen Bramness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Abuse potential of intranasal buprenorphine versus buprenorphine/naloxone in buprenorphine-maintained heroin users.

Authors:  Jermaine D Jones; Maria A Sullivan; Suzanne K Vosburg; Jeanne M Manubay; Shanthi Mogali; Verena Metz; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Induction of pregnant women onto opioid-agonist maintenance medication: an analysis of withdrawal symptoms and study retention.

Authors:  Amber M Holbrook; Hendree E Jones; Sarah H Heil; Peter R Martin; Susan M Stine; Gabriele Fischer; Mara G Coyle; Karol Kaltenbach
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Lack of reduction in buprenorphine injection after introduction of co-formulated buprenorphine/naloxone to the Malaysian market.

Authors:  R Douglas Bruce; Sumathi Govindasamy; Laurie Sylla; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

10.  Comparison of prescriber evaluations and patient-directed self-reports in office-based practice for buprenorphine treatment of opiate-dependent individuals in France, 2002.

Authors:  Estelle Lavie; Mélina Fatséas; Jean-Pierre Daulouède; Cécile Denis; Jacques Dubernet; Laurent Cattan; Marc Auriacombe
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.