Literature DB >> 15204288

Effect of load position on physiological and perceptual responses during load carriage with an internal frame backpack.

Kristin J Stuempfle1, Daniel G Drury, Amanda L Wilson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of load position in an internal frame backpack on physiological and perceptual variables. Ten female participants walked on a level treadmill for 10 min carrying 25% of their body weight in a high, central, or low position. The variables measured included oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation (VE), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). VO2, VE, and RPE were significantly lower in the high position (18.6 +/- 2.3 ml/kg/min, 31.7 +/- 5.0 l/min, 2.8 +/- 0.8, respectively) compared to the low position (22.2 +/- 3.0 ml/kg/min, 38.6 +/- 7.5 l/min, 3.7 +/- 1.0, respectively). HR, R, and RR did not change significantly as the load was moved from the high (129.8 +/- 16.8, 0.89 +/- 0.06, 30.3 +/- 4.2, respectively) to the low position (136.0 +/- 25.3, 0.92 +/- 0.04, 33.8 +/- 5.2, respectively). The results of this study suggest that load placement is an important factor in the physiological and perceptual responses to load carriage, and that packing heavy items high in the backpack may be the most energy efficient method of carrying a load on the back.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204288     DOI: 10.1080/0014013042000193264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  Effects of extra load position on energy expenditure in treadmill running.

Authors:  Arve Vorland Pedersen; Rasmus Stokke; Asgeir Mamen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A comparison of the physiological consequences of head-loading and back-loading for African and European women.

Authors:  R Lloyd; B Parr; S Davies; T Partridge; C Cooke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Impact of Backpacks on Ergonomics: Biomechanical and Physiological Effects: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Matteo Genitrini; Francesca Dotti; Eleonora Bianca; Ada Ferri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei P Huang; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Effect of backpack position on foot weight distribution of school-aged children.

Authors:  Kyung Kim; Chang Ju Kim; Duck-Won Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  Effect of backpack shoulder straps length on cervical posture and upper trapezius pressure pain threshold.

Authors:  Osama Ragaa Abdelraouf; Hamada Ahmed Hamada; Ali Selim; Wael Shendy; Hoda Zakaria
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-09-29

7.  Altering Compliance of a Load Carriage Device in the Medial-Lateral Direction Reduces Peak Forces While Walking.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Martin; Qingguo Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Development and Experimental Verification of an Ergonomic Backpack.

Authors:  Mohamed Z Ramadan; Sultan N Al-Tayyar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Mechanical Efficiency Investigation of an Ankle-Assisted Robot for Human Walking With a Backpack-Load.

Authors:  Longhan Xie; Zhihou Wang; Guowei Huang; Biao Liu; Zikang Zhou
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.