Literature DB >> 15204115

Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning.

Marc J Buehner1, Jon May.   

Abstract

Associative learning theory postulates two main determinants for human causal learning: contingency and contiguity. In line with such an account, participants in Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson (1989) failed to discover causal relations involving delays of more than two seconds. More recent research has shown that the impact of contiguity and delay is mediated by prior knowledge about the timeframe of the causal relation in question. Buehner and May (2002, 2003) demonstrated that the detrimental effect of delay can be significantly reduced if reasoners are aware of potential delays. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the negative influence of delay can be abolished completely by a subtle change in the experimental instructions. Temporal contiguity is thus not essential for human causal learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204115     DOI: 10.1080/02724990344000123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  14 in total

1.  The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments.

Authors:  Samuel D Hannah; Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Time perception and the experience of agency.

Authors:  Carola Haering; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-07

3.  Causing time: Evaluating causal changes to the when rather than the whether of an outcome.

Authors:  W James Greville; Marc J Buehner; Mark K Johansen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

Review 4.  Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference.

Authors:  Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Structural awareness mitigates the effect of delay in human causal learning.

Authors:  W James Greville; Adam A Cassar; Mark K Johansen; Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

6.  Spontaneous assimilation of continuous values and temporal information in causal induction.

Authors:  Jessecae K Marsh; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The influence of temporal distributions on causal induction from tabular data.

Authors:  W James Greville; Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

8.  Assessing evidence for a common function of delay in causal learning and reward discounting.

Authors:  W James Greville; Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-15

9.  The temporal priority principle: at what age does this develop?

Authors:  Michelle L Rankin; Teresa McCormack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-08

10.  Context and time in causal learning: contingency and mood dependent effects.

Authors:  Rachel M Msetfi; Caroline Wade; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.