Literature DB >> 15204109

Perceptual learning in humans: roles of preexposure schedule, feedback, and discrimination assay.

D M Dwyer1, K I Hodder, R C Honey.   

Abstract

In three experiments, humans received preexposure to two compound flavours (AX and BX: saline-lemon and sucrose-lemon) that were presented either in an intermixed (e.g., AX, BX,...BX, AX,...) or a blocked (e.g., AX, AX,...BX, BX...) fashion. Subsequently, AX was paired with an unpleasant bitter taste, and the discriminability of AX and BX was assessed using the accuracy of same/different judgements and by the extent to which any learned dislike of AX generalized to BX. When participants received feedback about the accuracy of their same/different judgements during preexposure those given intermixed preexposure were more accurate in making these judgements during the test than those given blocked preexposure (Experiments 1 and 2A), however, there was no evidence of any learned dislike in these experiments. In Experiment 2B, in which participants did not receive feedback about the accuracy of their judgements, there was no effect of the preexposure regime on same/different judgements, but there was a learned dislike of AX, and this generalized less to BX in participants given intermixed than in those given blocked preexposure. The beneficial effects of intermixed preexposure are consistent with results from other species (chicks and rats), but the differences created by the presence or absence of feedback place constraints on the analysis of these effects. Copyright 2004 The Experimental Psychology Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15204109     DOI: 10.1080/02724990344000114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  10 in total

1.  Within-subjects assessment of the within-compound associations resulting from intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules.

Authors:  Gabriel Rodríguez; Gumersinda Alonso
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task.

Authors:  Antonio A Artigas; Jose Prados
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia.

Authors:  Victoria A Diedrichs; Jennifer P Lundine; Deena Schwen Blackett; Alexandra Zezinka Durfee; Xueliang Jeff Pan; Stacy M Harnish
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Prevention and treatment strategies for contextual overgeneralization.

Authors:  Dieuwke Sevenster; Kim Haesen; Bram Vervliet; Merel Kindt; Rudi D'Hooge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rapid and long-lasting improvements in neural discrimination of acoustic signals with passive familiarization.

Authors:  Efe Soyman; David S Vicario
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in the time course of learning for hard compared to easy training.

Authors:  Adrian Garcia; Shu-Guang Kuai; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-07

8.  The contributions of value-based decision-making and attentional bias to alcohol-seeking following devaluation.

Authors:  Abigail K Rose; Kyle Brown; Matt Field; Lee Hogarth
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Brain correlates of experience-dependent changes in stimulus discrimination based on the amount and schedule of exposure.

Authors:  Matthew E Mundy; Paul E Downing; Robert C Honey; Krish D Singh; Kim S Graham; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Alcohol devaluation has dissociable effects on distinct components of alcohol behaviour.

Authors:  Abigail K Rose; Kyle Brown; James MacKillop; Matt Field; Lee Hogarth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.530

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.