AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the discriminatory power and potential turn around time (TAT) of a PCR-based method for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from screening swabs. METHODS: Screening swabs were examined using the current laboratory protocol of direct culture on mannitol salt agar supplemented with oxacillin (MSAO-direct). The PCR method involved pre-incubation in broth for 4 hours followed by a multiplex PCR with primers directed to mecA and nuc genes of MRSA. The reference standard was determined by pre-incubation in broth for 4 hours followed by culture on MSAO (MSAO-broth). RESULTS: A total of 256 swabs was analysed. The rates of detection of MRSA using MSAO-direct, MSAO-broth and PCR were 10.2, 13.3 and 10.2%, respectively. For PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 66.7% (95%CI 51.9-83.3%), 98.6% (95%CI 97.1-100%), 84.6% (95%CI 76.2-100%) and 95.2% (95%CI 92.4-98.0%), respectively, and these results were almost identical to those obtained from MSAO-direct. The agreement between MSAO-direct and PCR was 61.5% (95%CI 42.8-80.2%) for positive results, 95.6% (95%CI 93.0-98.2%) for negative results and overall was 92.2% (95%CI 88.9-95.5%). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The discriminatory power of PCR and MSAO-direct is similar but the level of agreement, especially for true positive results, is low. (2) The potential TAT for the PCR method provides a marked advantage over conventional methods. (3) Further modifications to the PCR method such as increased broth incubation time, use of selective broth and adaptation to real-time PCR may lead to improvement in sensitivity and TAT.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the discriminatory power and potential turn around time (TAT) of a PCR-based method for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from screening swabs. METHODS: Screening swabs were examined using the current laboratory protocol of direct culture on mannitol salt agar supplemented with oxacillin (MSAO-direct). The PCR method involved pre-incubation in broth for 4 hours followed by a multiplex PCR with primers directed to mecA and nuc genes of MRSA. The reference standard was determined by pre-incubation in broth for 4 hours followed by culture on MSAO (MSAO-broth). RESULTS: A total of 256 swabs was analysed. The rates of detection of MRSA using MSAO-direct, MSAO-broth and PCR were 10.2, 13.3 and 10.2%, respectively. For PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 66.7% (95%CI 51.9-83.3%), 98.6% (95%CI 97.1-100%), 84.6% (95%CI 76.2-100%) and 95.2% (95%CI 92.4-98.0%), respectively, and these results were almost identical to those obtained from MSAO-direct. The agreement between MSAO-direct and PCR was 61.5% (95%CI 42.8-80.2%) for positive results, 95.6% (95%CI 93.0-98.2%) for negative results and overall was 92.2% (95%CI 88.9-95.5%). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The discriminatory power of PCR and MSAO-direct is similar but the level of agreement, especially for true positive results, is low. (2) The potential TAT for the PCR method provides a marked advantage over conventional methods. (3) Further modifications to the PCR method such as increased broth incubation time, use of selective broth and adaptation to real-time PCR may lead to improvement in sensitivity and TAT.
Authors: M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ae-Chin Oh; Jin Kyung Lee; Ha Na Lee; Young Jun Hong; Yoon Hwan Chang; Seok-Il Hong; Dong Ho Kim Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 2.952