Literature DB >> 15203529

If formal CME is ineffective, why do physicians still participate?

P J McLeod1, A H McLeod.   

Abstract

Formal or traditional CME can be criticized because organizers often ignore adult learning principles when designing courses. Critics also suggest that formal CME courses have limited impact on attendees' behaviors and practices. The authors agree that attention must be paid to pedagogic principles to assure success of educational courses, but feel that the extant negative evidence related to the impact of formal CME is narrow in scope and of inadequate strength to seriously damn formal approaches. Survey responses were received from 853 practicing physicians who say they still regularly attend formal CME courses. They are motivated to attend to satisfy specific professional needs and for personal reasons. Formal CME is still popular despite what its critics say. The authors are convinced that attention to physicians' perceived needs, effective use of social marketing strategies, and adherence to adult learning principles can assure successful delivery of CME and that formal CME is a useful complement to physician-driven informal CME.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15203529     DOI: 10.1080/01421590310001643136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  7 in total

1.  Effects of continuing professional development on clinical performance: results of a study involving family practitioners in Quebec.

Authors:  François Goulet; Eveline Hudon; Robert Gagnon; Eliane Gauvin; Francine Lemire; Isabelle Arsenault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Formal and informal continuing education activities and athletic training professional practice.

Authors:  Kirk J Armstrong; Thomas G Weidner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Physician engagement in regularly scheduled rounds.

Authors:  Adam Bass; Heather Armson; Kevin McLaughlin; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  Process-oriented evaluation of an international faculty development program for Asian developing countries: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Do-Hwan Kim; Jong-Hyuk Lee; Jean Park; Jwa-Seop Shin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Evolving role of pharmaceutical physicians in medical evidence and education.

Authors:  Sajita Setia; Nicola J Ryan; Prasad S Nair; Elma Ching; Kannan Subramaniam
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-11-02

6.  Collecting Validity Evidence: A Hands-on Workshop for Medical Education Assessment Instruments.

Authors:  Caroline R Paul; Michael S Ryan; Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Thanakorn Jirasevijinda; Patricia D Quigley; Janice L Hanson; Amal M Khidir; Jean Petershack; Joseph Jackson; Linda Tewksbury; Mary Esther M Rocha
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2019-04-12

7.  An Innovative Needs Assessment Approach to Develop Relevant Continuing Professional Development for Psychiatrists.

Authors:  Francesca Luconi; Richard Montoro; Leonora Lalla; Meron Teferra
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.