Literature DB >> 15203498

The relationship between measures of patient satisfaction and enablement and professional assessments of consultation competence.

R K McKinley1, R C Fraser, R H Baker, R D Riley.   

Abstract

The authors examined the extent of the relationship between a Consultation satisfaction questionnaire and Patient enablement instrument scores and professionally assessed consultation competence scores of senior medical students. Three analyses were performed: (i) linear regression with mean overall competence score as response variable; (ii) sensitivity and specificity calculations using patient scores to classify competence; (iii) a repeated measures model with consultation-specific competence score as response variable. One hundred and nineteen students and 388 patients took part. Consultation satisfaction and enablement scores were weakly correlated with overall and consultation specific competence scores (correlation coefficient 0.16 to 0.44). 'Satisfaction with professional care' had a sensitivity of 0.68, specificity of 0.72 and positive and negative predictive values of 0.32 and 0.92 respectively. It is concluded that patient and professional assessments may complement, but do not replace, each other. Levels of patient satisfaction should not be used as proxy measures of the quality of consultation competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15203498     DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001683186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  Patient feedback in revalidation: an exploratory study using the consultation satisfaction questionnaire.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Andrew Smith; Carolyn Tarrant; Robert K McKinley; Nicholas Taub
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Ian Shemilt; Nada Khan; Sophie Park; James Thomas
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-17

3.  Patient enablement after a consultation with a general practitioner-Explaining variation between countries, practices and patients.

Authors:  Elina Tolvanen; Peter P Groenewegen; Tuomas H Koskela; Torunn Bjerve Eide; Christine Cohidon; Elise Kosunen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The validity and reliability of the patient enablement instrument (PEI) after GP appointments in Finnish health care centres.

Authors:  Elina Tolvanen; Tuomas H Koskela; Mika Helminen; Elise Kosunen
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2020-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.