Literature DB >> 1520219

A comparison of the nauseogenic potential of low-frequency vertical versus horizontal linear oscillation.

J F Golding1, M Kerguelen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the nauseogenic potential of low-frequency linear motion in the Earth-vertical versus the Earth-horizontal plane, delivered through the same Z-axis of the head and body. Twelve subjects were challenged with linear motion (0.3 Hz, 1.8 ms-2 rms) through the same head and body Z-axis in the Earth-vertical (sitting upright) versus horizontal (lying on the back), while either performing a continuous visual search task or with their eyes closed. Each subject completed the four conditions on a Latin square design with sessions spaced 1 week apart at the same time of day. Vertical motion was clearly more provocative than horizontal motion, and nauseogenicity of motion was exacerbated by a visual search task. Motion sickness impaired performance of the search task. Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (MSSQ) scores correlated with individual susceptibility to the motion challenge. Mean sickness ratings for vertical motion showed some correspondence with those predicted by mathematical models of motion sickness dose response relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1520219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  11 in total

1.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Sofronis Sofroniou; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Labyrinthine lesions and motion sickness susceptibility.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Physiological consequences of military high-speed boat transits.

Authors:  Stephen D Myers; Trevor D Dobbins; Stuart King; Benjamin Hall; Ruth M Ayling; Sharon R Holmes; Tom Gunston; Rosemary Dyson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Motion sickness on tilting trains.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Mingjia Dai; Dmitri Ogorodnikov; Jean Laurens; Theodore Raphan; Philippe Müller; Alexiou Athanasios; Jürgen Edmaier; Thomas Grossenbacher; Klaus Stadtmüller; Ueli Brugger; Gerald Hauser; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Electroacupuncture Could Reduce Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Healthy Male Adults: A Double-Blinded Study.

Authors:  Ourania Fydanaki; Panagiotis Kousoulis; Efthimios Dardiotis; Ioannis Bizakis; Ioannis Hajiioannou
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  The effects of the selective muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist darifenacin, and of hyoscine (scopolamine), on motion sickness, skin conductance & cognitive function.

Authors:  John F Golding; Keith A Wesnes; Brian R Leaker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 8.  Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  How feelings of unpleasantness develop during the progression of motion sickness symptoms.

Authors:  A J C Reuten; S A E Nooij; J E Bos; J B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Motion sickness, nausea and thermoregulation: The "toxic" hypothesis.

Authors:  Eugene Nalivaiko; John A Rudd; Richard Hy So
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.