Literature DB >> 15202102

PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma.

Dominique Delbeke1, William H Martin.   

Abstract

The evaluation of patients with known or suspected recurrent colorectal carcinoma is now an accepted indication for positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) imaging. FDG-PET does not replace imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) for preoperative anatomic evaluation but is indicated as the initial test for diagnosis and staging of recurrence and for preoperative staging (N and M) of known recurrence that is considered to be resectable. FDG-PET imaging is valuable for the differentiation of posttreatment changes from recurrent tumor, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions (indeterminate lymph nodes, hepatic and pulmonary lesions), and the evaluation of patients with rising tumor markers in the absence of a known source. The addition of FDG-PET to the evaluation of these patients reduces overall treatment costs by accurately identifying patients who will and will not benefit from surgical procedures. Although initial staging at the time of diagnosis is often performed during colectomy, FDG-PET imaging is recommended for a subgroup of patients at high risk (with elevated CEA levels) and normal CT and for whom surgery can be avoided if FDG-PET shows metastases. Screening for recurrence in patients at high risk has also been advocated. FDG-PET imaging seems promising for monitoring patient response to therapy but larger studies are necessary. The diagnostic implications of integrated PET-CT imaging include improved detection of lesions on both the CT and FDG-PET images, better differentiation of physiologic from pathologic foci of metabolism, and better localization of the pathologic foci. This new powerful technology provides more accurate interpretation of both CT and FDG-PET images and therefore more optimal patient care. PET-CT fusion images affect the clinical management by guiding further procedures (biopsy, surgery, radiation therapy), excluding the need for additional procedures, and changing both inter- and intramodality therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15202102     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  22 in total

Review 1.  False-positive FDG PET uptake--the role of PET/CT.

Authors:  Sandra J Rosenbaum; Thomas Lind; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Masayuki Nakajo; Yoriko Kajiya; Megumi Jinguji; Nobuaki Nishimata; Shunji Shimaoka; Tohru Nihara; Kuniaki Aridome; Sadao Tanaka; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Atushi Tani; Chihaya Koriyama
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin; Jianping Wang; Suzhan Zhang; Yunshi Zhong; Li Ren; Ye Wei; Shaochong Zeng; Deseng Wan; Shu Zheng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Clinical impact of PET/MR in treated colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Amorim; Theodore S Hong; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Cristina R Ferrone; David L Berger; Liliana G Bordeianou; Rocco Ricciardi; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Jennifer Y Wo; Motaz Qadan; Mark Vangel; Lale Umutlu; David Groshar; Lina G Cañamaques; Debra A Gervais; Umar Mahmood; Bruce R Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Positron emission tomography for staging and assessment of tumor response of hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Robert S Hellman; Arthur Z Krasnow; Gary S Sudakoff
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Epidemiology and management options for colorectal cancer in children.

Authors:  Raya Saab; Wayne L Furman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Role of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; N Fusco; P Broccoli; M Maurici; M Yamgoue; R Danieli; S D'Urso; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  FDG PET as a prognostic predictor in the early post-therapeutic evaluation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Higashi; Etsuro Hatano; Iwao Ikai; Ryuichi Nishii; Yuji Nakamoto; Koichi Ishizu; Tsuyoshi Suga; Hidekazu Kawashima; Kaori Togashi; Satoru Seo; Koji Kitamura; Yasutsugu Takada; Yasuji Takada; Shinji Uemoto; Shinji Kamimoto
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Impact of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT on staging and irradiation of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Brigita Paskeviciute; Tobias Bölling; Markus Brinkmann; Ganna Rudykina; Iris Ernst; Lars Stegger; Otmar Schober; Normann Willich; Matthias Weckesser; Stefan Könemann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Non-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for nodal staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Tetsuo Maeda; Tsuyoshi Morimoto; Mototaka Miyake; Yasuaki Arai; E Edmund Kim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.