Literature DB >> 1520205

A comparison of tiaprofenic acid, mefenamic acid and placebo in the treatment of dysmenorrhoea in general practice.

M W Tilyard1, S M Dovey.   

Abstract

The efficiency and side-effects of tiaprofenic acid, mefenamic acid and placebo were compared in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea. The trial was a double-blind prospective randomized 3-way crossover study during 6 successive menstrual cycles following a 2-cycle run-in period and involved 50 women with primary dysmenorrhoea selected from 96 volunteers between 16 and 35 years of age. Overall pain was significantly less (p less than 0.05) on treatment with tiaprofenic acid than on treatment with mefanemic acid, placebo, or the women's usual treatments. Both active treatments were well tolerated but more side-effects were reported during treatment with mefenamic acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1520205     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1992.tb01933.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

Review 1.  Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Liam Smeeth; Richard Ashcroft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Roxithromycin vs cefaclor.

Authors:  T Hughes; W G Scott; H M Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea.

Authors:  Jane Marjoribanks; Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke; Cindy Farquhar; Michelle Proctor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-30

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with primary dysmenorrhea: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Feng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.395

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.