Literature DB >> 15201843

Laboratory practices for prenatal group B streptococcal screening--seven states, 2003.

.   

Abstract

In the United States, group B streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of serious bacterial infections in newborns. In 1996, consensus guidelines for use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to prevent perinatal GBS disease recommended either of two methods for identifying candidates for chemoprophylaxis: 1) late prenatal culture-based screening for GBS colonization or 2) monitoring of women intrapartum for particular risk factors associated with early-onset GBS disease. Evidence that culture-based screening was substantially more effective than the risk-based approach led to revised guidelines in 2002 recommending late prenatal GBS screening for all pregnant women. Although methods for isolation and identification of GBS from prenatal specimens remained the same as those recommended in 1996, the 2002 guidelines recommended that laboratories perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing on prenatal GBS isolates from women at high risk for penicillin anaphylaxis and clarified that laboratories should report the presence of any GBS in urine specimens from pregnant women. To assess laboratory adherence to recommendations in the 2002 guidelines, CDC's Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs)/Emerging Infections Program Network surveyed clinical laboratories about prenatal culture-processing practices in 2003. This report summarizes the results of that survey, which indicated that, although adherence to GBS isolation procedures was high, opportunities exist to improve implementation of recommendations related to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and GBS bacteriuria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  6 in total

1.  Group B streptococcus prevalence in pregnant women from North-Eastern Italy: advantages of a screening strategy based on direct plating plus broth enrichment.

Authors:  Marina Busetti; Pierlanfranco D'Agaro; Cesare Campello
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Clindamycin-resistant group B Streptococcus and failure of intrapartum prophylaxis to prevent early-onset disease.

Authors:  Anne J Blaschke; Laurie S Pulver; E Kent Korgenski; Lucy A Savitz; Judy A Daly; Carrie L Byington
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  The prevalence of urogenital infections in pregnant women experiencing preterm and full-term labor.

Authors:  Paulo César Giraldo; Edilson D Araújo; José Eleutério Junior; Rose Luce Gomes do Amaral; Mauro R L Passos; Ana Katherine Gonçalves
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-31

4.  Perinatal group B streptococcal disease prevention, Minnesota.

Authors:  Craig A Morin; Karen White; Anne Schuchat; Richard N Danila; Ruth Lynfield
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jussara M Silva; Airton T Stein; Holger J Schünemann; Ronaldo Bordin; Ricardo Kuchenbecker; Maria de Lourdes Drachler
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women from the 18th Health Region of Paraná State.

Authors:  Simone Cristina Castanho Sabaini de Melo; Aline Balandis Costa; Flávia Teixeira Ribeiro da Silva; Natália Maria Maciel Guerra Silva; Cristiano Massao Tashima; Rosilene Fressatti Cardoso; Rúbia Andreia F de Pádua; Isolde Previdelli; Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho; Sandra Marisa Pelloso
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.846

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.