PURPOSE: We developed an algorithm for the management of urethral stricture based on cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: United Kingdom medical and hospital costs associated with the current management of urethral stricture were calculated using private medical insurance schedules of reimbursement and clean intermittent self-catheterization supply costs. These costs were applied to 126 new patients treated endoscopically for urethral stricture in a general urological setting between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1999. Treatment failure was defined as recurrent symptomatic stricture requiring further operative intervention following initial intervention. Mean followup available was 25 months (range 1 to 132). RESULTS: The costs were urethrotomy/urethral dilation 2,250.00 pounds sterling (3,375.00 dollars, ratio 1.00), simple 1-stage urethroplasty 5,015.00 pounds sterling (7,522.50 dollars, ratio 2.23), complex 1-stage urethroplasty 5,335.00 pounds sterling (8,002.50 dollars, ratio 2.37) and 2-stage urethroplasty 10,370 pounds sterling (15,555.00 dollars, ratio 4.61). Of the 126 patients assessed 60 (47.6%) required more than 1 endoscopic retreatments (mean 3.13 each), 50 performed biweekly clean intermittent self-catheterization and 7 underwent urethroplasty during followup. The total cost per patient for all 126 patients for stricture treatment during followup was 6,113 pounds sterling (9,170 dollars). This cost was calculated by multiplying procedure cost by the number of procedures performed. A strategy of urethrotomy or urethral dilation as first line treatment, followed by urethroplasty for recurrence yielded a total cost per patient of 5,866 pounds sterling (8,799 dollars). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of initial urethrotomy or urethral dilation followed by urethroplasty in patients with recurrent stricture proves to be the most cost-effective strategy. This financially based strategy concurs with evidence based best practice for urethral stricture management.
PURPOSE: We developed an algorithm for the management of urethral stricture based on cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: United Kingdom medical and hospital costs associated with the current management of urethral stricture were calculated using private medical insurance schedules of reimbursement and clean intermittent self-catheterization supply costs. These costs were applied to 126 new patients treated endoscopically for urethral stricture in a general urological setting between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1999. Treatment failure was defined as recurrent symptomatic stricture requiring further operative intervention following initial intervention. Mean followup available was 25 months (range 1 to 132). RESULTS: The costs were urethrotomy/urethral dilation 2,250.00 pounds sterling (3,375.00 dollars, ratio 1.00), simple 1-stage urethroplasty 5,015.00 pounds sterling (7,522.50 dollars, ratio 2.23), complex 1-stage urethroplasty 5,335.00 pounds sterling (8,002.50 dollars, ratio 2.37) and 2-stage urethroplasty 10,370 pounds sterling (15,555.00 dollars, ratio 4.61). Of the 126 patients assessed 60 (47.6%) required more than 1 endoscopic retreatments (mean 3.13 each), 50 performed biweekly clean intermittent self-catheterization and 7 underwent urethroplasty during followup. The total cost per patient for all 126 patients for stricture treatment during followup was 6,113 pounds sterling (9,170 dollars). This cost was calculated by multiplying procedure cost by the number of procedures performed. A strategy of urethrotomy or urethral dilation as first line treatment, followed by urethroplasty for recurrence yielded a total cost per patient of 5,866 pounds sterling (8,799 dollars). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of initial urethrotomy or urethral dilation followed by urethroplasty in patients with recurrent stricture proves to be the most cost-effective strategy. This financially based strategy concurs with evidence based best practice for urethral stricture management.
Authors: Catherine R Harris; E Charles Osterberg; Thomas Sanford; Amjad Alwaal; Thomas W Gaither; Jack W McAninch; Charles E McCulloch; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Urology Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Niels V Johnsen; David F Penson; W Stuart Reynolds; Douglas F Milam; Roger R Dmochowski; Melissa R Kaufman Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Lindsay A Hampson; Tracy K Lin; Leslie Wilson; Isabel E Allen; Thomas W Gaither; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Waseem Aboulela; Mohammed S ElSheemy; Mahmoud Shoukry; Ahmed M Shouman; Ahmed I Shoukry; Waleed Ghoneima; Mohamed El Ghoneimy; Hany A Morsi; Mostafa Abdel Mohsen; Hesham Badawy Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.370