Literature DB >> 15201773

Urethroplasty in patients older than 65 years: indications, results, outcomes and suggested treatment modifications.

Richard A Santucci1, Jack W McAninch, Layla A Mario, Atul Rajpurkar, Anuj K Chopra, Kennon S Miller, Noel A Armenakas, Edward B Tieng, Allen F Morey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite an aging population, the results of urethroplasty in elderly patients have not been extensively reported. We performed a multi-institutional review of urethroplasty results in 70 elderly males to determine outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all urethroplasties performed on males older than 64 years with at least 6 months of followup at 4 medical centers. Stricture type varied and included anastomotic urethroplasty (44%), penile fasciocutaneous onlay flap (31%), Johanson urethroplasty (stage 1, 6%, stages 1 and 2, 4%), buccal mucosa grafts (7%), foreskin grafts (6%) and meatoplasty (1%).
RESULTS: Stricture recurred in 11 (16%) patients, but was managed with a single direct visual internal urethrotomy or dilation in 5 of 11 patients, yielding a final success rate of 91%. Recurrent strictures were more common after fasciocutaneous flaps (7 of 22 cases, 32%) than end-to-end urethroplasty (2 of 31 cases, 6%, p <0.05). Compared to patients younger than 65 years there were more treatment failures, but this was not statistically significant. Perioperative complications were uncommon. Moderate bladder outlet obstructive symptoms developed in 3 patients due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Notably 6 patients treated previously for post-radiation strictures did well without complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Older men tolerate urethroplasty and these data indicate that therapy should not be withheld solely on the basis of age. The potential for impaired flap blood supply in this population is suggested but has not been proven. Benign prostatic hyperplasia must be considered in those patients who have decreased stream after stricture repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201773     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000128810.86535.be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Understanding patients' preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Tracy K Lin; Leslie Wilson; Isabel E Allen; Thomas W Gaither; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Stricture length and etiology as preoperative independent predictors of recurrence after urethroplasty: A multivariate analysis of 604 urethroplasties.

Authors:  Adam S Kinnaird; Max A Levine; Druvtej Ambati; Jeff D Zorn; Keith F Rourke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Outcome of urethral strictures treated by endoscopic urethrotomy and urethroplasty.

Authors:  Javier Tinaut-Ranera; Miguel Ángel Arrabal-Polo; Sergio Merino-Salas; Mercedes Nogueras-Ocaña; Víctor Manuel López-León; Francisco Palao-Yago; Miguel Arrabal-Martín; Clara Lahoz-García; Miguel Alaminos; Armando Zuluaga-Gomez
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Outcome of urethral strictures managed by general surgeons in a rural setting of India.

Authors:  Bhushan N Wani; Suhas N Jajoo; Anil M Bhole
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty?

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Jill C Buckley; Richard A Santucci; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Evaluation of the results of dorsolateral buccal mucosal augmentation urethroplasty.

Authors:  Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Kamil Gökhan Şeker; Yusuf Arıkan; Yunus Çolakoğlu; Emre Şam; Volkan Tuğcu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  High regional variation in urethroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Bradley D Figler; John L Gore; Sarah K Holt; Bryan B Voelzke; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Current concepts in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.

Authors:  Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi N Dorairajan; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-07

9.  Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in men-risk factors for recurrence and complications: a third referral centre experience in anterior urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft.

Authors:  Marco Spilotros; Neha Sihra; Sachin Malde; Mahreen H Pakzad; Rizwan Hamid; Jeremy L Ockrim; Tamsin J Greenwell
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.