Literature DB >> 15201302

Wing hair sensilla underlying aimed hindleg scratching of the locust.

Keri L Page1, Thomas Matheson.   

Abstract

The anatomy and physiology of exteroceptors on the surfaces of the wings have been described in many insects, but their roles in behaviour have been less well studied. They have often been assumed to have a role primarily in flight. We show that the wings of the locust Schistocerca gregaria possess at least three different hair types with characteristic patterns of distribution that determine the probability of eliciting targeted hindleg scratching behaviour. The different hair types are defined by their morphology and innervation. The shortest hairs (14-46 microm) are basiconic receptors containing both chemosensory and mechanosensory afferents. They are distributed widely across the dorsal surfaces of the forewings; some are located on the ventral surfaces of the hindwings, but none are found on the ventral surfaces of the forewings or the dorsal surfaces of the hindwings. Medium length hairs (73-159 microm) are found on all wing surfaces, but are restricted to the veins, principally the subcosta on the dorsal surface of the forewings. The longest hairs (316-511 microm) are found only on the postcubitus vein on the dorsal surfaces of the forewings, so that they form a pair of dorsal rows when the wings are folded at rest. Touching the dorsal surface of a forewing can elicit aimed scratching movements of a hindleg, and we show that the probability of eliciting a scratch differs for different stimulus sites and for different start positions of the hind leg. The effectiveness of different stimulus sites can be correlated with the distribution of tactile hairs on the dorsal forewing surface. Touching the long hairs provides the strongest drive to elicit a scratch, and ablating them reduces the probability to almost zero. We conclude that input from forewing tactile hairs plays an important role in eliciting hindleg scratching and encodes the spatial location required for targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201302     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  New vistas on the initiation and maintenance of insect motor behaviors revealed by specific lesions of the head ganglia.

Authors:  Ram Gal; Frederic Libersat
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Motor inhibition affects the speed but not accuracy of aimed limb movements in an insect.

Authors:  Delphine Calas-List; Anthony J Clare; Alexandra Komissarova; Thomas A Nielsen; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Mechanosensation and Adaptive Motor Control in Insects.

Authors:  John C Tuthill; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Grooming Behavior as a Mechanism of Insect Disease Defense.

Authors:  Marianna Zhukovskaya; Aya Yanagawa; Brian T Forschler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  The gram-negative sensing receptor PGRP-LC contributes to grooming induction in Drosophila.

Authors:  Aya Yanagawa; Claudine Neyen; Bruno Lemaitre; Frédéric Marion-Poll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic Basis of Natural Variation in Spontaneous Grooming in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aya Yanagawa; Wen Huang; Akihiko Yamamoto; Ayako Wada-Katsumata; Coby Schal; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Aimed limb movements in a hemimetabolous insect are intrinsically compensated for allometric wing growth by developmental mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexandra J Patel; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Methods for independently manipulating palatability and color in small insect prey.

Authors:  Alex M Winsor; Malika Ihle; Lisa A Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hygienic grooming is induced by contact chemicals in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aya Yanagawa; Alexandra M A Guigue; Frédéric Marion-Poll
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Simultaneous activation of parallel sensory pathways promotes a grooming sequence in Drosophila.

Authors:  Stefanie Hampel; Claire E McKellar; Julie H Simpson; Andrew M Seeds
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.