Literature DB >> 15200653

Use of spinal anaesthesia in paediatric patients: a single centre experience with 1132 cases.

Franco Puncuh1, Elisabetta Lampugnani, Hannu Kokki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia has been used in children for over 100 years and in the last two decades its popularity for newborns and infants has increased, but there are still unanswered questions with the technique.
METHODS: We evaluated the characteristics of spinal block including ease of performance, efficacy, adverse effects and complications in 1132 children, aged 6 months to 14 years, undergoing surgery in the lower part of the body. Local ethical committee approved the protocol of this prospective study, and parents gave written informed consent and older children their assent. All patients were sedated with midazolam, thiopental or propofol intravenously during spontaneous ventilation. No inhalation anaesthetics were used. Spinal block was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 0.2 mg x kg(-1).
RESULTS: Efficacy, safety and ease of performance of the spinal block were shown to be satisfactory in most children. Only 27 of the 1132 children needed any supplementation. The incidence and severity of complications was low. Only nine of 942 children, < 10 years of age and eight of 190 children, 10 years or older, developed hypotension. The incidences of postdural puncture headache, in five of the 1132 children, and backache, in nine of the 1132, were low. No other neurological complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine is a feasible anaesthetic method in children for surgery in the lower part of the body. Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15200653     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01240.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of Failure of Awake Regional Anesthesia for Neonatal Hernia Repair: Data from the General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia Study--Comparing Apnea and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.

Authors:  Geoff Frawley; Graham Bell; Nicola Disma; Davinia E Withington; Jurgen C de Graaff; Neil S Morton; Mary Ellen McCann; Sarah J Arnup; Oliver Bagshaw; Andrea Wolfler; David Bellinger; Andrew J Davidson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Spinal anesthesia plus ketamine-midazolam sedation for pediatric orthopedic surgery in a developing country.

Authors:  E Piraccini; R Albarello; C Biagini; A Novi; V Agnoletti; G Gambale
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2012

3.  Spinal anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy: Analysis of 36 patients.

Authors:  Ozkan Onal; Seza Apiliogullari; Ergun Gunduz; Jale Bengi Celik; Hakan Senaran
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Philipp Opfermann; Caspar Wiener; Werner Schmid; Markus Zadrazil; Martin Metzelder; Oliver Kimberger; Peter Marhofer
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 5.  Spinal anesthesia in children: A review.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Usha Saha
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01

6.  Spinal anesthesia instead of general anesthesia for infants undergoing tendon Achilles lengthening.

Authors:  Mohammad AlSuhebani; David P Martin; Lance M Relland; Tarun Bhalla; Allan C Beebe; Amanda T Whitaker; Walter Samora; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2018-05-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.