Literature DB >> 1520056

Surrogate decision-maker preferences for medical care of severely demented nursing home patients.

R Cogen1, B Patterson, S Chavin, J Cogen, L Landsberg, J Posner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the absence of advanced directives, physicians treating demented patients rely on surrogates to help make medical care decisions.
METHOD: We surveyed family members of severely demented nursing home residents to determine preferences for medical intervention in five hypothetical situations involving tube feeding, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
RESULTS: Only 11.8% of surrogates rejected all interventions. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and tube feeding were accepted least frequently (31.6% and 36.4%, respectively). Mechanical ventilation, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admission were accepted by 43.6%, 63.4%, and 75.2%, respectively. There was no correlation between previous surrogate experience with an intervention and its acceptance. Nearly 70% of surrogates indicated that decisions were independent of any previously expressed resident views.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, surrogates of even the most demented nursing home patients prefer hospital level services including intensive care unit care for the treatment of acute illness. Efforts to control access to services on ethical or economic grounds may meet with resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1520056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

1.  Artificial nutrition and hydration in the patient with advanced dementia: is withholding treatment compatible with traditional Judaism?

Authors:  M R Gillick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Advanced dementia research in the nursing home: the CASCADE study.

Authors:  Susan L Mitchell; Dan K Kiely; Richard N Jones; Holly Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Joan M Teno
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Decision-making for long-term tube-feeding in cognitively impaired elderly people.

Authors:  S L Mitchell; F M Lawson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences.

Authors:  Jemima Dooley; Matthew Booker; Rebecca Barnes; Penny Xanthopoulou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Ethics roundtable: Using new, expensive drugs.

Authors:  Richard Burrows; David Crippen; R Phillip Dellinger; David F Kelly; Stephen Streat; Leslie M Whetstine
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  How are treatment decisions made about artificial nutrition for individuals at risk of lacking capacity? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Gemma Clarke; Katy Harrison; Anthony Holland; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kanthee Anantapong; Nathan Davies; Justin Chan; Daisy McInnerney; Elizabeth L Sampson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.070

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.