BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia has been shown to constitute a state of sympathetic overactivity. However, it remains unclear if the sympathetic activity precedes preeclampsia or represents only a secondary phenomenon. To further investigate this issue, we performed a prospective study in pregnant women considered to be at increased risk for preeclampsia owing to preeclampsia during a preceding pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two women with a history of preeclampsia were longitudinally studied on three occasions: twice during pregnancy (M1: 22 +/- 4, M2: 33 +/- 5 weeks) and once postpartum (M3: 26 +/- 6 weeks postpartum). We measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), forearm blood flow, and blood pressure at rest and during reactive hyperaemia after forearm occlusion. RESULTS: At M1 and M2, none of the subjects was hypertensive, however, muscle sympathetic nerve activity levels were significantly augmented, compared with their postpartum values (M1: 21 +/- 9, M2: 29 +/- 14, M3: 9 +/- 5 bursts min(-1); P < 0.05). Forearm vascular resistance did not significantly change from M1 through M3 (M1: 16 +/- 9, M2: 15 +/- 7, M3: 16 +/- 7 U; P = NS). Gestational muscle sympathetic nerve activity values did not differ significantly among the subjects with subsequent preeclampsia compared with those who remained normotensive [with preeclampsia (n = 6): M1: 21 +/- 5, M2: 27 +/- 6, M3: 7 +/- 4 bursts min(-1); without preeclampsia (n = 16): M1: 21 +/- 11, M2: 30 +/- 16, M3: 9 +/- 6 bursts min(-1); P = NS]. CONCLUSION: Invariably, all women at risk for preeclampisa showed a pregnancy-induced increase in MSNA (pregnancy-induced sympathetic overactivity, PISO), which normalized after delivery. Most importantly, PISO is not necessarily associated with peripheral vasoconstriction and hypertension. Furthermore, only a subset of patients developed preeclampsia later on. Therefore, we hypothesize that PISO constitutes a precursor of preeclampsia which is physiologically compensated for by vasodilating mechanisms, leading to preeclampsia only when they fail.
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia has been shown to constitute a state of sympathetic overactivity. However, it remains unclear if the sympathetic activity precedes preeclampsia or represents only a secondary phenomenon. To further investigate this issue, we performed a prospective study in pregnant women considered to be at increased risk for preeclampsia owing to preeclampsia during a preceding pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two women with a history of preeclampsia were longitudinally studied on three occasions: twice during pregnancy (M1: 22 +/- 4, M2: 33 +/- 5 weeks) and once postpartum (M3: 26 +/- 6 weeks postpartum). We measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), forearm blood flow, and blood pressure at rest and during reactive hyperaemia after forearm occlusion. RESULTS: At M1 and M2, none of the subjects was hypertensive, however, muscle sympathetic nerve activity levels were significantly augmented, compared with their postpartum values (M1: 21 +/- 9, M2: 29 +/- 14, M3: 9 +/- 5 bursts min(-1); P < 0.05). Forearm vascular resistance did not significantly change from M1 through M3 (M1: 16 +/- 9, M2: 15 +/- 7, M3: 16 +/- 7 U; P = NS). Gestational muscle sympathetic nerve activity values did not differ significantly among the subjects with subsequent preeclampsia compared with those who remained normotensive [with preeclampsia (n = 6): M1: 21 +/- 5, M2: 27 +/- 6, M3: 7 +/- 4 bursts min(-1); without preeclampsia (n = 16): M1: 21 +/- 11, M2: 30 +/- 16, M3: 9 +/- 6 bursts min(-1); P = NS]. CONCLUSION: Invariably, all women at risk for preeclampisa showed a pregnancy-induced increase in MSNA (pregnancy-induced sympathetic overactivity, PISO), which normalized after delivery. Most importantly, PISO is not necessarily associated with peripheral vasoconstriction and hypertension. Furthermore, only a subset of patients developed preeclampsia later on. Therefore, we hypothesize that PISO constitutes a precursor of preeclampsia which is physiologically compensated for by vasodilating mechanisms, leading to preeclampsia only when they fail.
Authors: Sushant M Ranadive; Ronee E Harvey; Brian D Lahr; Virginia M Miller; Michael J Joyner; Jill N Barnes Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Dalia Yousif; Ioannis Bellos; Ana Isabel Penzlin; Mido Max Hijazi; Ben Min-Woo Illigens; Alexandra Pinter; Timo Siepmann Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Mark B Badrov; Sun Young Park; Jeung-Ki Yoo; Michinari Hieda; Yoshiyuki Okada; Sara S Jarvis; Abigail S Stickford; Stuart A Best; David B Nelson; Qi Fu Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Mark B Badrov; Jeung-Ki Yoo; Craig D Steinback; Margie H Davenport; Qi Fu Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Cynthia Ashley; Danielle Burton; Yrsa B Sverrisdottir; Mikael Sander; David K McKenzie; Vaughan G Macefield Journal: J Physiol Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 5.182