BACKGROUND: Artificial neural networks (ANN) represent a promising alternative to classical statistical and mathematic methods to solve multidimensional nonlinear problems. The aim of the study was to verify, by comparing the performance of ANN with that of experienced nephrologists, whether ANN are useful tools in hemodialysis to predict the follow-up (=1 month after the observation used for the prediction) dietary protein intake (PCR), and whether their performance is influenced by the size of the population and by the data pool used to built the model. METHODS: A combined retrospective and prospective observational study was performed in two Swiss dialysis units (84 chronic hemodialysis patients, 500 monthly clinical observations and biochemical test results). Using mathematical models based on linear regressions to evaluate the variables, ANN were built and then prospectively and interinstitutionally compared with the ability of six experienced nephrologists to predict the follow-up PCR. RESULTS: ANN compared with nephrologists gave a more accurate correlation between estimated and calculated follow-up PCR (P < 0.001). The same superiority of ANN was also seen in the ability to detect a follow-up PCR <1.00 g/kg/day expressed as a percentage of correct predictions, sensitivity, specificity, and predictivity. The interinstitutional performance of the ANN is positively influenced by the size and the variability of the population used to build the mathematical model. CONCLUSION: The use of ANN significantly improves the ability of the experienced nephrologist to estimate and to detect an unsatisfactory (<1.00 g/kg/day) follow-up PCR. The size of the population selected to build the ANN is critical for his performance.
BACKGROUND: Artificial neural networks (ANN) represent a promising alternative to classical statistical and mathematic methods to solve multidimensional nonlinear problems. The aim of the study was to verify, by comparing the performance of ANN with that of experienced nephrologists, whether ANN are useful tools in hemodialysis to predict the follow-up (=1 month after the observation used for the prediction) dietary protein intake (PCR), and whether their performance is influenced by the size of the population and by the data pool used to built the model. METHODS: A combined retrospective and prospective observational study was performed in two Swiss dialysis units (84 chronic hemodialysis patients, 500 monthly clinical observations and biochemical test results). Using mathematical models based on linear regressions to evaluate the variables, ANN were built and then prospectively and interinstitutionally compared with the ability of six experienced nephrologists to predict the follow-up PCR. RESULTS: ANN compared with nephrologists gave a more accurate correlation between estimated and calculated follow-up PCR (P < 0.001). The same superiority of ANN was also seen in the ability to detect a follow-up PCR <1.00 g/kg/day expressed as a percentage of correct predictions, sensitivity, specificity, and predictivity. The interinstitutional performance of the ANN is positively influenced by the size and the variability of the population used to build the mathematical model. CONCLUSION: The use of ANN significantly improves the ability of the experienced nephrologist to estimate and to detect an unsatisfactory (<1.00 g/kg/day) follow-up PCR. The size of the population selected to build the ANN is critical for his performance.
Authors: Alexandru Burlacu; Adrian Iftene; Daniel Jugrin; Iolanda Valentina Popa; Paula Madalina Lupu; Cristiana Vlad; Adrian Covic Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 3.411