PURPOSE: To establish which personal and contextual factors are predictive of successful outcomes in postgraduate medical education. METHOD: We performed a follow-up study of 118 doctors on a postgraduate occupational health training programme on the management of mental health problems. The following personal and contextual variables were measured as potential predictors of outcome: gender; age; years of experience as a doctor; university of graduation; learning style (Kolb); present employer (occupational health service), and educational format (problem-based or lecture-based). The main outcome measures were: scores on knowledge tests consisting of true/false and open answer questions, and performance in practice based on self-report and performance indicators. To determine the effect of potential predictive factors univariate analyses of variance and repeated measurement analysis of variance was applied. RESULTS: The mean scores of knowledge (P < 0.001) and performance (P = 0.001) of the participants increased after the educational programme. After multivariate analysis female gender was positively related to accruements in both knowledge and performance (both P < 0.05), independently of the influence of other factors. Accommodator learning style showed a relation with knowledge increase (P = 0.05), but had no influence on performance (P = 0.79). The problem-based educational format yielded a better performance outcome (P = 0.05), but had no influence on knowledge tests (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Gender and learning style were found to be related to an increase in knowledge. Gender was also found to be related to improvement in performance after a postgraduate medical education programme. We found no interactions with course design (i.e. problem-based or non problem-based learning formats), but further research could reveal other cues, suggesting practical consequences of student characteristics for course design in postgraduate training.
PURPOSE: To establish which personal and contextual factors are predictive of successful outcomes in postgraduate medical education. METHOD: We performed a follow-up study of 118 doctors on a postgraduate occupational health training programme on the management of mental health problems. The following personal and contextual variables were measured as potential predictors of outcome: gender; age; years of experience as a doctor; university of graduation; learning style (Kolb); present employer (occupational health service), and educational format (problem-based or lecture-based). The main outcome measures were: scores on knowledge tests consisting of true/false and open answer questions, and performance in practice based on self-report and performance indicators. To determine the effect of potential predictive factors univariate analyses of variance and repeated measurement analysis of variance was applied. RESULTS: The mean scores of knowledge (P < 0.001) and performance (P = 0.001) of the participants increased after the educational programme. After multivariate analysis female gender was positively related to accruements in both knowledge and performance (both P < 0.05), independently of the influence of other factors. Accommodator learning style showed a relation with knowledge increase (P = 0.05), but had no influence on performance (P = 0.79). The problem-based educational format yielded a better performance outcome (P = 0.05), but had no influence on knowledge tests (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Gender and learning style were found to be related to an increase in knowledge. Gender was also found to be related to improvement in performance after a postgraduate medical education programme. We found no interactions with course design (i.e. problem-based or non problem-based learning formats), but further research could reveal other cues, suggesting practical consequences of student characteristics for course design in postgraduate training.
Authors: G Gradl-Dietsch; A K Menon; A Gürsel; A Götzenich; N Hatam; A Aljalloud; S Schrading; F Hölzl; M Knobe Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Sandra E Zwolsman; Nynke van Dijk; Anita A H Verhoeven; Wouter de Ruijter; Margreet Wieringa-de Waard Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Martijn D F Rhebergen; Annet F Lenderink; Frank J H van Dijk; Carel T J Hulshof Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Bunmi S Malau-Aduli; Adrian Ys Lee; Nick Cooling; Marianne Catchpole; Matthew Jose; Richard Turner Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 2.463