Literature DB >> 15199579

Donor age and gender effects on osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix.

Kathy Traianedes1, James L Russell, Jean T Edwards, Harrison A Stubbs, Ileene R Shanahan, David Knaack.   

Abstract

Allogeneic demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has been used extensively as a clinical graft material because of its inherent osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. There is continued debate over the acceptable age range of donors for bone and whether the effectiveness of the tissue as a graft is influenced by gender. Contradictory evidence has been obtained with DBM prepared from both animals and humans. The goal of the present investigation was to evaluate the effect of donor age and gender on the osteoinductivity of DBM prepared from human donors [male (133) and female (115) donors grouped in 10-year age brackets up to 85 years] with a statistically relevant sample size using the athymic rat ectopic bone formation model. Among males, there was a statistically significant linear association between age and osteoinductivity value (p <.001), but not among females (p =.20). The rate of change among males was 0.009 units per year. The biological relevance of such a small change in osteoinductivity is likely to be negligible, as the total variation explained by the regressions was only 8.2%. A two-way ANOVA as related to donor age (only donors < 76 years of age) and gender yielded no significant statistical association of osteoinductivity with age group, gender, and their interaction. The results confirm that properly processed demineralized bone from donors through at least 85 years of age is a viable grafting material. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15199579     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  15 in total

1.  A comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrix for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; A Alanay; Davies Mark; Linda E A Kanim; Pat A Campbell; Edgar G Dawson; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Enhanced osteoinductive capacity and decreased variability by enrichment of demineralized bone matrix with a bone protein extract.

Authors:  Joana M Ramis; Javier Calvo; Aina Matas; Cristina Corbillo; Antoni Gayà; Marta Monjo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Growth factors in orthopaedic surgery: demineralized bone matrix versus recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  Maurice Hinsenkamp; Jean-Francois Collard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix is independent of donor bisphosphonate use.

Authors:  Zvi Schwartz; Sharon L Hyzy; Mark A Moore; Shawn A Hunter; Chad J Ronholdt; MoonHae Sunwoo; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  Grafting using injectable calcium sulfate in bone tumor surgery: comparison with demineralized bone matrix-based grafting.

Authors:  June Hyuk Kim; Joo Han Oh; Ilkyu Han; Han-Soo Kim; Seok Won Chung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-08-19

Review 7.  Demineralized Dentin Matrix for Dental and Alveolar Bone Tissues Regeneration: An Innovative Scope Review.

Authors:  Mohammed E Grawish; Lamyaa M Grawish; Hala M Grawish; Mahmoud M Grawish; Ahmed A Holiel; Nessma Sultan; Salwa A El-Negoly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 8.  Tissue engineering of bone: the reconstructive surgeon's point of view.

Authors:  U Kneser; D J Schaefer; E Polykandriotis; R E Horch
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Guided bone regeneration using demineralized allogenic bone matrix with calcium sulfate: case series.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Ji-Young Lee; Su-Gwan Kim; Seung-Chul Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Implantation of silicon dioxide-based nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and pure phase beta-tricalciumphosphate bone substitute granules in caprine muscle tissue does not induce new bone formation.

Authors:  Shahram Ghanaati; Samuel E Udeabor; Mike Barbeck; Ines Willershausen; Oliver Kuenzel; Robert A Sader; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.