Literature DB >> 15198498

Computerized tomography evaluation of a resorbable implant after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Timothy R Kuklo1, Michael K Rosner, David W Polly.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Synthetic bioabsorbable implants have recently been introduced in spinal surgery; consequently, the indications, applications, and results are still evolving. The authors used absorbable interbody spacers (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) packed with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein (Infuse; Medtronic Sofamor Danek) for single- and multiple-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures over a period of 18 months. This is a consecutive case series in which postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scanning was used to assess fusion status.
METHODS: There were 22 patients (17 men, five women; 39 fusion levels) whose mean age was 41.6 years (range 23-70 years) and in whom the mean follow-up duration was 12.4 months (range 6-18 months). Bridging bone was noted as early as the 3-month postoperative CT scan when obtained; solid arthrodesis was routinely noted between 6 and 12 months in 38 (97.4%) of 39 fusion levels. In patients who underwent repeated CT scanning, the fusion mass appeared to increase with time, whereas the disc space height remained stable. Although the results are early (mean 12-month follow-up duration), there was only one noted asymptomatic delayed union/nonunion at L5-S1 in a two-level TLIF with associated screw breakage. There were no infections or complications related to the cages.
CONCLUSIONS: The bioabsorbable cages appear to be a viable alternative to metal interbody spacers, and may be ideally suited to spinal interbody applications because of their progressive load-bearing properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15198498     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.3.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  9 in total

1.  Adverse effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ivan Bojanic; Domagoj Delimar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteolysis following resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D, L-lactide PLIF cage use: a review of cases.

Authors:  Andrew Frost; Elmanzour Bagouri; Mark Brown; Vinay Jasani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages.

Authors:  P I J M Wuisman; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The use of BoneWelding® technology in spinal surgery: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Dorothee Heidenreich; Jens D Langhoff; Katja Nuss; Katharina Kluge; Käthi Kämpf; Katalin Zlinsky; Monika Hilbe; Jörg Mayer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Assessment of Progenix(®) DBM putty bone substitute in a rabbit posterolateral fusion model.

Authors:  Joseph D Smucker; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2012

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Timothy U Jiya; T Smit; B J van Royen; M Mullender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable cervical spacers and low-dose rhBMP-2 in multi-level ACDF.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Shen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Bin Lin; Hui Yu; Zhida Chen; Zhuanzhi Huang; Wenbin Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Fuping Li; Chen Li; Xin Xi; Zhili Zeng; Bin Ma; Ning Xie; Hang Wang; Yan Yu; Liming Cheng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.