Literature DB >> 15198133

The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures.

K Robin Yabroff1, Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Jane Ingham.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA and despite many recent advances in detection and treatment, over half a million cancer patients in this country will die from their disease each year.
OBJECTIVE: Using cancer as a prototype, we provide a conceptual framework to identify and review barriers to optimal end-of-life care and propose examples of linked process and outcome measures that could be used to evaluate whether standards of optimal end-of-life care are being achieved.
METHODS: We propose a conceptual model of end-of-life care and use this model to review the published literature to identify the key goals of optimal end-of-life care and summarize existing barriers to optimal end-of-life care. We then provide examples of process and outcome measures linked to the goals of optimal end-of-life care and domains within the conceptual framework.
RESULTS: Within all components of care at the end-of-life--societal attitudes, health care system(s), providers, and patients and their families--there are significant barriers to the quality of care. Some of the most critical barriers to optimal care at the end-of-life in the USA are limited availability, and coverage of, co-ordinated service delivery; poor provider communication and diagnostic skills; limited opportunities for training in palliative care; patient fears and attitudes towards the sick role, and a lack of, or inadequate health insurance. Proposed patient, provider, and system level measures of the quality of care were guided by goals of optimal end-of-life care, and focus on communication about prognosis and risks and benefits of treatment, development of clear and informed treatment goals, delivery of services consistent with treatment goals, and promotion of quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: At present, there are substantial societal, health care system, provider, and patient barriers to obtaining optimal cancer care at the end-of-life. Ongoing discussions about appropriate measures of the quality of end-of-life care are gaining momentum, however. The proposed process and outcome measures for assessing optimal end-of-life care use cancer as a prototype, but are broadly applicable to other patient populations with life-threatening disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15198133     DOI: 10.1191/0269216304pm880oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  13 in total

1.  Measuring end-of-life care processes in nursing homes.

Authors:  Helena Temkin-Greener; Nan Tracy Zheng; Sally A Norton; Timothy Quill; Susan Ladwig; Peter Veazie
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-07-02

2.  Utilization of supportive and palliative care services among oncology outpatients at one academic cancer center: determinants of use and barriers to access.

Authors:  Pallavi Kumar; David Casarett; Amy Corcoran; Krupali Desai; Qing Li; Jinbo Chen; Corey Langer; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  End-of-life care in nursing homes: the importance of CNA staff communication.

Authors:  Nan Tracy Zheng; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  Knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about opioids, palliative care, and homecare of advanced cancer patients: a nationwide survey in Japan.

Authors:  Miki Akiyama; Toru Takebayashi; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Kei Hirai; Motohiro Matoba; Nobuya Akizuki; Yutaka Shirahige; Akemi Yamagishi; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Association of age, gender, and race with intensity of end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Authors:  Susan Miesfeldt; Kimberly Murray; Lee Lucas; Chiang-Hua Chang; David Goodman; Nancy E Morden
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Barriers to referral to inpatient palliative care units in Japan: a qualitative survey with content analysis.

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyashita; Kei Hirai; Tatsuya Morita; Makiko Sanjo; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Advance care planning in adults with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Gregory S Sawicki; Edward J Dill; Daniel Asher; Deborah E Sellers; Walter M Robinson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Selwyn O Rogers; Susan K Baum; Beth A Virnig; Haiden A Huskamp; Craig C Earle; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The palliative prognostic score and survival in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Davide Tassinari; Luigi Montanari; Marco Maltoni; Michela Ballardini; Alessandra Piancastelli; Marco Musi; Giampiero Porzio; Vincenzo Minotti; Augusto Caraceni; Barbara Poggi; Anna Stella; Federica Aielli; Emanuela Scarpi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study.

Authors:  Kathleen Leemans; Joachim Cohen; Anneke L Francke; Robert Vander Stichele; Susanne Jj Claessen; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.