RATIONALE: The phenotype of genetically modified animals is thought to result from an interaction of gene manipulation with the genetic background and environmental factors. OBJECTIVES: To test the behavioral and drug responses of Penk1(-/-) mice on different genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Congenic C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse strains with a targeted deletion of the Penk1 gene were generated. Behavior and drug effects were tested in models of pain and anxiety. RESULTS: Penk1(-/-) mice showed exaggerated responses to painful or threatening environmental stimuli, but the expressivity of the mutant phenotype was strongly dependent on the behavioral paradigm and on the genetic background. For example, elevated levels of anxiety were readily detectable in C57BL/6J-Penk1(-/-) mice in the light-dark and startle response tests, but not in the social interaction test. In contrast, we found elevated levels of anxiety in DBA/2J-Penk1(-/-) mice only in the zero-maze and social interaction tests. In some cases, the idiosyncratic behavior masked the appearance of the knockout gene effect. The activity of the anxiogenic drug, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, but not the anxiolytic drug diazepam, was strain and genotype dependent. Mice with the Penk1 mutation on the DBA/2J, but not on other genetic backgrounds, showed an increased opioid-dependent stress-induced analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The behavioral effects of the Penk1 gene deletion persists on different genetic backgrounds, but its detection sometimes requires the use of different behavioral paradigms. (2) The behavior of the background strain should be considered in the analysis of knockout mice to avoid floor and ceiling effects, which may mask the phenotype.
RATIONALE: The phenotype of genetically modified animals is thought to result from an interaction of gene manipulation with the genetic background and environmental factors. OBJECTIVES: To test the behavioral and drug responses of Penk1(-/-) mice on different genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Congenic C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse strains with a targeted deletion of the Penk1 gene were generated. Behavior and drug effects were tested in models of pain and anxiety. RESULTS:Penk1(-/-) mice showed exaggerated responses to painful or threatening environmental stimuli, but the expressivity of the mutant phenotype was strongly dependent on the behavioral paradigm and on the genetic background. For example, elevated levels of anxiety were readily detectable in C57BL/6J-Penk1(-/-) mice in the light-dark and startle response tests, but not in the social interaction test. In contrast, we found elevated levels of anxiety in DBA/2J-Penk1(-/-) mice only in the zero-maze and social interaction tests. In some cases, the idiosyncratic behavior masked the appearance of the knockout gene effect. The activity of the anxiogenic drug, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, but not the anxiolytic drug diazepam, was strain and genotype dependent. Mice with the Penk1 mutation on the DBA/2J, but not on other genetic backgrounds, showed an increased opioid-dependent stress-induced analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The behavioral effects of the Penk1 gene deletion persists on different genetic backgrounds, but its detection sometimes requires the use of different behavioral paradigms. (2) The behavior of the background strain should be considered in the analysis of knockout mice to avoid floor and ceiling effects, which may mask the phenotype.
Authors: F Magara; U Müller; Z W Li; H P Lipp; C Weissmann; M Stagljar; D P Wolfer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-04-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: R J Rodgers; R Augar; N Berryman; C J Hansom; M L O'Mahony; R M Palmer; A Stevens; A J Tallett Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: A Bilkei-Gorzo; I Racz; O Valverde; M Otto; K Michel; M Sastre; M Sarstre; A Zimmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ildiko Racz; Britta Schürmann; Anna Karpushova; Martin Reuter; Sven Cichon; Christian Montag; Robert Fürst; Christian Schütz; Petra E Franke; Jana Strohmaier; Thomas F Wienker; Lars Terenius; Urban Osby; Agneta Gunnar; Wolfgang Maier; Andras Bilkei-Gorzó; Markus Nöthen; Andreas Zimmer Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Sarah Ann R Anderson; Michael Michaelides; Parisa Zarnegar; Yanhua Ren; Pernilla Fagergren; Panayotis K Thanos; Gene-Jack Wang; Michael Bannon; John F Neumaier; Eva Keller; Nora D Volkow; Yasmin L Hurd Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Inge Sillaber; Markus Panhuysen; Markus S H Henniger; Frauke Ohl; Claudia Kühne; Benno Pütz; Thomas Pohl; Jan M Deussing; Marcelo Paez-Pereda; Florian Holsboer Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 4.530