Literature DB >> 15197203

Abnormal cytogenetics at date of morphologic complete remission predicts short overall and disease-free survival, and higher relapse rate in adult acute myeloid leukemia: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8461.

Guido Marcucci1, Krzysztof Mrózek, Amy S Ruppert, Kellie J Archer, Mark J Pettenati, Nyla A Heerema, Andrew J Carroll, Prasad R K Koduru, Jonathan E Kolitz, Lisa J Sterling, Colin G Edwards, John Anastasi, Richard A Larson, Clara D Bloomfield.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with morphologic complete remission (CR) ultimately relapse, better predictors for outcome are needed. Recently, Cheson et al suggested using cytogenetic remission (CRc) as part of the criteria for CR. To our knowledge, ours is the first relatively large study evaluating the usefulness of CRc attained immediately following induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included AML patients treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B front-line studies with cytogenetic samples obtained at diagnosis and at the first day of documented CR following induction. Patients with abnormal cytogenetics at diagnosis, and normal cytogenetics at CR (NCR; n = 103) were compared with those with abnormal cytogenetics both at diagnosis and at CR (ACR; n = 15) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Cox proportional hazards models determined the prognostic significance of cytogenetics at CR, adjusting for other covariates.
RESULTS: Clinical features were similar for both groups, with the exception of favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21), inv(16)/t(16;16), t(15;17)] at diagnosis, which was more frequent (P =.03) in the NCR group. Median follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 1.0 to 11.4 years). ACR patients had significantly shorter OS (P =.006) and DFS (P =.0001), and higher CIR (P =.0001). In multivariable models, the NCR and ACR groups were predictors for OS (P =.03), DFS (P =.02), and CIR (P =.05). The relative risk of relapse or death was 2.1 times higher for ACR patients than for NCR patients (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.9).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that converting to normal karyotype at the time of first CR is an important prognostic indicator and support the use of CRc as a criterion of CR in AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197203     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow evaluation for diagnosis and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Catherine Lai; Elihu Estey; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 2.  Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Authors:  Gevorg Tamamyan; Tapan Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Elias Jabbour; Naval Daver; Maro Ohanian; Hagop Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  Acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics.

Authors:  Raya Mawad; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Use of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwind; Madlen Jentzsch; Enrica Bach; Sebastian Stasik; Christian Thiede; Uwe Platzbecker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-01-30

5.  Chromosome abnormalities at onset of complete remission are associated with worse outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and an abnormal karyotype at diagnosis: CALGB 8461 (Alliance).

Authors:  Christian Niederwieser; Deedra Nicolet; Andrew J Carroll; Jonathan E Kolitz; Bayard L Powell; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Richard M Stone; John C Byrd; Krzysztof Mrózek; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: optimal management and recent developments.

Authors:  Luis Villela; Javier Bolaños-Meade
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Prognostic impact of discordant results from cytogenetics and flow cytometry in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Min Fang; Barry Storer; Brent Wood; Boglarka Gyurkocza; Brenda M Sandmaier; Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Primary refractory acute myeloid leukaemia - in search of better definitions and therapies.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Epigenetic landscape of acute myelogenous leukemia--moving toward personalized medicine.

Authors:  Gurpreet Lamba; Sayyed Kaleem Zaidi; Kimberly Luebbers; Claire Verschraegen; Gary S Stein; Alan Rosmarin
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.429

10.  Kit inhibitor APcK110 induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Stefan Faderl; Ashutosh Pal; William Bornmann; Maher Albitar; David Maxwell; Quin Van; Zhenghong Peng; David Harris; Zhiming Liu; Inbal Hazan-Halevy; Hagop M Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.