Literature DB >> 15197049

Identification of clinically significant prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen screening.

Ryan P Smith1, S Bruce Malkowicz, Richard Whittington, Keith VanArsdalen, Zelig Tochner, Alan J Wein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of screening for early-stage prostate cancer has been debated in the literature. However, there are well-established prognostic factors (Gleason score [GS], pretreatment prostate-specific antigen [PSA], and percent positive biopsy findings [%+Bx]) that predict biologically aggressive disease. These factors, together with a patient's age and general state of health, will permit physicians to project the effect of a prostate tumor over the patient's expected lifetime. This study was performed to determine the proportion of clinically significant prostate cancers diagnosed in a screened population.
METHODS: From 1991 through 2002, 977 patients with nonpalpable (T1c) prostate cancer were seen for evaluation and comprise the study group. Patients were classified according to pretreatment PSA level, GS, %+Bx, and age.
RESULTS: Based on tumor characteristics alone, 130 patients were noted to be at high risk (GS = 8-10 or PSA level >20 ng/mL; or GS = 7 or PSA level >10-< or =20 ng/mL and >50%+Bx), with a historical 4-year PSA control of 10% to 30% after definitive therapy. An additional 45 patients were at intermediate risk (GS = 7, PSA level >10-< or =20 ng/mL, and 34%-50%+Bx), with a historical 4-year PSA control of 50% to 60% after definitive therapy. Additional patients were identified who had a cumulative anticipated prostate cancer mortality greater than 30% to 50% based on age and GS (GS = 7, age < or =70 years [n = 89]; GS = 6, age < or =65 years [n = 337]). The total at risk for clinically significant tumors was 601 (61.5%) of 977 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with nonpalpable disease diagnosed as having prostate cancer by PSA screening have clinically significant cancers. This supports the continued use of PSA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197049     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.11.1227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  3 in total

1.  Are clinically insignificant prostate cancers really insignificant among Korean men?

Authors:  Chan Dong Yeom; Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Sang Un Park; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Copy number variation of urine exfoliated cells by low-coverage whole genome sequencing for diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Youyan Guan; Xiaobing Wang; Kaopeng Guan; Dong Wang; Xingang Bi; Zhendong Xiao; Zejun Xiao; Xingli Shan; Linjun Hu; Jianhui Ma; Changling Li; Yong Zhang; Jianzhong Shou; Baiyun Wang; Ziliang Qian; Nianzeng Xing
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.622

3.  Are hypoechoic lesions on transrectal ultrasonography a marker for clinically significant prostate cancer?

Authors:  Tae Il Noh; Yoon Sun Shin; Ji Sung Shim; Jong Hyun Yoon; Jae Heon Kim; Jae Hyun Bae; Du Geon Moon; Jae Young Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.