Literature DB >> 15196809

Factors governing prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation of the acoustic startle response in mice.

Claudia F Plappert1, Peter K D Pilz, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler.   

Abstract

The influence of prepulses on the acoustic startle response (ASR) was measured in three inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6J, 129/SvHsd, and AKR/OlaHsd, and one hybrid strain produced by crossing wild mice and NMRI mice. Prepulse inhibition (PPI), i.e. reduction of ASR by prepulses, was maximal when the interval between prepulses and startle stimuli was in the range of 37.5-100 ms. Prepulse facilitation (PPF), i.e. increase of ASR by prepulses, was maximal when the prepulse preceded the startle stimulus by 12.5 ms. PPI increased with increasing prepulse SPL, PPF first increased then decreased when prepulse SPL was increased. Percent PPI was independent from startle stimulus SPL. All strains showed a long-term increase of PPI when tested for several days; one strain (129) also showed an increase of PPF over days. The present results clearly show that PPI and PPF are independent processes, which add to yield the final response change. PPF and the observed long-term changes of PPI and PPF are stronger expressed in mice than have been observed in rats under similar conditions. Since there were significant differences between the strains of mice with respect to PPI and PPF, genetically different strains of mice are a promising tool to study these two processes. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196809     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  Repeated quinpirole treatments produce neurochemical sensitization and associated behavioral changes in female hamsters.

Authors:  Julia A Chester; Amanda J Mullins; Chau H Nguyen; Val J Watts; Robert L Meisel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Interaction between the effects of corticotropin-releasing factor and prepulse parameters on prepulse inhibition in two inbred rat strains and the F1 generation of a cross between them.

Authors:  Lisa H Conti; Jane E Sutherland; Carey M Muhlhauser
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effects of stress, acute alcohol treatment, or both on pre-pulse inhibition in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  M S Powers; J A Chester
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Electrophysiology meets fMRI: neural correlates of the startle reflex assessed by simultaneous EMG-fMRI data acquisition.

Authors:  Irene Neuner; Tony Stöcker; Thilo Kellermann; Veronika Ermer; Hans Peter Wegener; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Schneider; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Working memory deficits, increased anxiety-like traits, and seizure susceptibility in BDNF overexpressing mice.

Authors:  Francesco Papaleo; Jill L Silverman; Jordan Aney; Qingjun Tian; Charlotte L Barkan; Kathryn K Chadman; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  Acoustic startle modification as a tool for evaluating auditory function of the mouse: Progress, pitfalls, and potential.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Derik Behrens; Georg Klump
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Acetylcholine receptor and behavioral deficits in mice lacking apolipoprotein E.

Authors:  Jessica A Siegel; Theodore S Benice; Peter Van Meer; Byung S Park; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Behavioral evidence for possible simultaneous induction of hyperacusis and tinnitus following intense sound exposure.

Authors:  G Chen; C Lee; S A Sandridge; H M Butler; N F Manzoor; J A Kaltenbach
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-26

9.  Addressing variability in the acoustic startle reflex for accurate gap detection assessment.

Authors:  Ryan J Longenecker; Inga Kristaponyte; Gregg L Nelson; Jesse W Young; Alexander V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Impaired prepulse inhibition and prepulse-elicited reactivity but intact reflex circuit excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia patients: a comparison with healthy subjects and medicated schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Philipp A Csomor; Benjamin K Yee; Joram Feldon; Anastasia Theodoridou; Erich Studerus; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.