Literature DB >> 15196798

Double dissociation of social and environmental stimulation on spatial learning and reversal learning in rats.

Nicole C A Schrijver1, Patrick N Pallier, Verity J Brown, Hanno Würbel.   

Abstract

Environmental enrichment induces structural and biochemical changes in the brains of mammals that correlate with improved learning and memory. Research in rats suggests that social compared to inanimate stimulation might affect behavior differently, by acting upon dissociable neural substrates. Here we tested this hypothesis at the behavioral level by examining whether social and inanimate stimulation affect spatial memory formation and non-spatial discrimination reversal learning selectively. Spatial memory formation is known to depend on hippocampal-neocortical pathways, whereas reversal learning depends primarily on prefrontal cortico-striatal pathways. Male Lister hooded rats were housed singly or in groups of three in either small barren or large enriched cages, from weaning onwards. After 10 weeks of differential housing, spatial learning and memory were examined in the Morris water maze, followed by a series of tactile and odour discriminations, including discrimination reversal, in a two-choice discrimination task. Regardless of inanimate stimulation, social deprivation affected neither the acquisition of simple or complex discriminations, nor spatial memory formation, but was associated with impaired reversal learning in the two-choice discrimination task. By contrast, inanimate deprivation, regardless of social stimulation, affected neither acquisition nor reversal of two-choice discriminations, but selectively delayed the acquisition of spatial memory in the Morris water maze. This is the first demonstration of a double dissociation of early social and inanimate stimulation on two distinct behavioural functions that are mediated by dissociable underlying neural pathways. These findings strengthen the view that social and inanimate stimulation act, at least in part, upon dissociable neural substrates. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196798     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  Empirical comparison of typical and atypical environmental enrichment paradigms on functional and histological outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher N Sozda; Ann N Hoffman; Adam S Olsen; Jeffrey P Cheng; Ross D Zafonte; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Physiological effects of enriched environment exposure and LTP induction in the hippocampus in vivo do not transfer faithfully to in vitro slices.

Authors:  Michael J Eckert; Wickliffe C Abraham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Have studies of the developmental regulation of behavioral phenotypes revealed the mechanisms of gene-environment interactions?

Authors:  F Scott Hall; Maria T G Perona
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-27

Review 4.  Animal models of early life stress: Implications for understanding resilience.

Authors:  David M Lyons; Karen J Parker; Alan F Schatzberg
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Effects of environmental enrichment on thermal sensitivity in an operant orofacial pain assay.

Authors:  Heather L Rossi; John K Neubert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Prefrontal plasticity and stress inoculation-induced resilience.

Authors:  Maor Katz; Chunlei Liu; Marie Schaer; Karen J Parker; Marie-Christine Ottet; Averi Epps; Christine L Buckmaster; Roland Bammer; Michael E Moseley; Alan F Schatzberg; Stephan Eliez; David M Lyons
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis.

Authors:  Carel P van Schaik; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Influence of late-life exposure to environmental enrichment or exercise on hippocampal function and CA1 senescent physiology.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar; Asha Rani; Olga Tchigranova; Wei-Hua Lee; Thomas C Foster
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Enhanced cognitive activity--over and above social or physical activity--is required to protect Alzheimer's mice against cognitive impairment, reduce Abeta deposition, and increase synaptic immunoreactivity.

Authors:  Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Takashi Mori; Stanley J Nazian; Jun Tan; Huntington Potter; Gary W Arendash
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Developmental Neuroscience Perspectives on Emotion Regulation.

Authors:  H Hill Goldsmith; Seth D Pollak; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2008-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.