Literature DB >> 15196614

The methods for handling missing data in clinical trials influence sample size requirements.

Guy-Robert Auleley1, Bruno Giraudeau, Gabriel Baron, Jean-Francis Maillefert, Maxime Dougados, Philippe Ravaud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Results of studies estimating osteoarthritis progression may be affected by missing values. In clinical trials assessing disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs, sample sizes should be calculated using close estimates of outcome variables. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Supposing a two-parallel group design in hip osteoarthritis clinical trials, we estimated sample sizes using the joint space width (JSW), number of patients with JSW progression >0.5 mm (JSN), time to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and time to JSN or THA using several approaches to deal with missing data.
RESULTS: Three-year clinical trials testing a treatment effect of 50%, with a power of 80%, could require sample sizes of 121 patients for JSW, 57 for JS progression using multiple imputation for handling missing values; 200 for THA; and 47 for JSN or THA. These numbers vary greatly depending on the approach chosen for handling missing data.
CONCLUSIONS: These results can help investigators plan clinical trials to select the primary outcome and a priori specify the way missing data will be handled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196614     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  3 in total

1.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Elena Losina; James Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Selection-Fusion Approach for Classification of Datasets with Missing Values.

Authors:  Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh; Hao Ying; Ming Dong
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 7.740

Review 3.  Methodological Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Leading Diabetes Journals From 2011 to 2013 Following CONSORT Statement: A System Review.

Authors:  Xiao Zhai; Yiran Wang; Qingchun Mu; Xiao Chen; Qin Huang; Qijin Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.