Literature DB >> 15196532

Prognostic impact of the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer.

Stefano Ciatto1, Guido Miccinesi, Marco Zappa, Zappa Marco, Miccinesi Guido.   

Abstract

The study aimed to assess whether the early detection of asymptomatic metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) improves the prognosis of the patient compared with a diagnosis at symptomatic onset. We reviewed 339 MCBC cases that were consecutively diagnosed from 1970 to 2001, for which reliable information on subjective symptoms was available. The association of early (asymptomatic vs. symptomatic) detection with mortality from breast cancer was studied by univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for potential confounders. A more favourable stage at diagnosis was evident for asymptomatic vs. symptomatic MCBC (pT1=84.2% vs. 58.1%, pN0 65.0% vs. 52.4%). The hazard ratio (HR) of breast cancer death was approximately half (0.49%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.29-0.83, P = 0.008) for asymptomatic vs. symptomatic MCBC. Although length bias may have occurred (symptomatic MCBC had a shorter free interval from the first cancer), the present evidence supports the practice of active follow-up aimed at the early detection of asymptomatic MCBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196532     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Hyman B Muss; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Risk factors for second screen-detected or interval breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer participating in mammography screening.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Les Irwig; Janie Lee; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Survival after locoregional recurrence or second primary breast cancer: impact of the disease-free interval.

Authors:  Annemieke Witteveen; Annemiek B G Kwast; Gabe S Sonke; Maarten J IJzerman; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Breast cancer "tailored follow-up" in Italian oncology units: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Clara Natoli; Davide Brocco; Isabella Sperduti; Antonio Nuzzo; Nicola Tinari; Michele De Tursi; Antonino Grassadonia; Lorenzo Mazzilli; Stefano Iacobelli; Teresa Gamucci; Patrizia Vici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Nariya Cho
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-06-07

7.  Insurance Status Predicts Survival in Women with Breast Cancer: Results of Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program in California.

Authors:  Rebecca A Nelson; Zeynep Bostanci; Veronica Jones; Joanne Mortimer; Amy Polverini; Lesley Taylor; Lisa Yee; John H Yim; Laura Kruper
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Second breast cancers in a Tuscan case series: characteristics, prognosis, and predictors of survival.

Authors:  S Ciatto; N Houssami; F Martinelli; R Bonardi; F H Cafferty; S W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.