Literature DB >> 15196030

Linker histone interaction shows divalent character with both supercoiled and linear DNA.

Thomas P Ellen1, K E van Holde.   

Abstract

The interaction of linker histone H1 with both linear and superhelical double-stranded DNA has been investigated at low ionic strengths. Gel mobility retardation experiments demonstrate strikingly different behavior for the two forms of DNA. First, the experiments strongly suggest that linker histone binds to superhelical DNA in a negatively cooperative mode. In contrast, binding of linker histone to linear DNA under the conditions employed here shows no cooperativity. Second, binding of linker histone to linear DNA results in aggregation of histone-DNA complexes, even at very low levels of input histone H1. Because H1 has been shown to interact as a monomer, this aggregation is evidence of the divalent character of the linker histone, for without H1's ability to bind to two duplex strands of DNA, aggregation could not occur. Although aggregation can be made to occur with superhelical DNA, it can do so only at near-saturation levels of input histone H1. Finally, in direct competition, linker histone binds to superhelical DNA to the complete exclusion of linear DNA, indicating that the linker histone's function is related to the crossover structures that differentiate superhelical DNA from linear DNA. We develop a model that explains the observed behavior of binding of linker histone to superhelical DNA that is consistent with both the divalent character of the linker histone and the negative cooperativity by which linker histone and superhelical DNA interact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15196030     DOI: 10.1021/bi0497704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Structural appearance of linker histone H1/siRNA complexes.

Authors:  Annekathrin Haberland; Sergei Zaitsev; Norbert Waldöfner; Bettina Erdmann; Michael Böttger; Wolfgang Henke
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Structural and dynamic properties of linker histone H1 binding to DNA.

Authors:  Rolf Dootz; Adriana C Toma; Thomas Pfohl
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  DNA coiled coils.

Authors:  J L Campos; L Urpí; T Sanmartín; C Gouyette; J A Subirana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Surface salt bridges modulate the DNA site size of bacterial histone-like HU proteins.

Authors:  Edwin Kamau; Nick D Tsihlis; L Alice Simmons; Anne Grove
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  C-terminal low-complexity sequence repeats of Mycobacterium smegmatis Ku modulate DNA binding.

Authors:  Ambuj K Kushwaha; Anne Grove
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Yeast high mobility group protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin and is evicted during repair of DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Arvind Panday; LiJuan Xiao; Anne Grove
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  The Structural Determinants behind the Epigenetic Role of Histone Variants.

Authors:  Manjinder S Cheema; Juan Ausió
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  The high mobility group protein HMO1 functions as a linker histone in yeast.

Authors:  Arvind Panday; Anne Grove
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.954

9.  Basic surface features of nuclear FKBPs facilitate chromatin binding.

Authors:  Andrew Leung; Francy-Pesek Jardim; Neda Savic; Yoan R Monneau; Rodrigo González-Romero; Geoff Gudavicius; Jose M Eirin-Lopez; Till Bartke; Cameron D Mackereth; Juan Ausió; Christopher J Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.