Literature DB >> 15195788

An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Charles M Balch1, Seng-Jaw Soong, Michael B Atkins, Antonio C Buzaid, Natale Cascinelli, Daniel G Coit, Irvin D Fleming, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Alan Houghton, John M Kirkwood, Kelly M McMasters, Martin F Mihm, Donald L Morton, Douglas S Reintgen, Merrick I Ross, Arthur Sober, John A Thompson, John F Thompson.   

Abstract

A completely revised staging system for cutaneous melanoma was implemented in 2003. The changes were validated with a prognostic factors analysis involving 17,600 melanoma patients from prospective databases. This major collaborative study of predicting melanoma outcome was conducted specifically for this project, and the results were used to finalize the criteria for this evidence-based staging system. In fact, this was the largest prognostic factors analysis of prospectively followed melanoma patients ever conducted. Important results that shaped the staging criteria involved both the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) criteria and stage grouping for all four stages of melanoma. Major changes in the staging include: (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration are the dominant predictors of survival in patients with localized melanoma (Stages I and II); deeper level of invasion (ie, IV and V) was independently associated with reduced survival only in patients with thin or T1 melanomas. (2) The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the tumor burden were the most dominant predictors of survival in patients with Stage III melanoma; patients with metastatic nodes detected by palpation had a shorter survival compared with patients whose nodal metastases were first detected by sentinel node excision of clinically occult or "microscopic" metastases. (3) The site of distant metastases (nonvisceral versus lung versus all other visceral metastatic sites) and the presence of elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were the dominant predictors of outcome in patients with Stage IV or distant metastases. (4) An upstaging was implemented for all patients with Stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated by histopathological criteria. (5) Satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases were merged into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease. (6) A new convention was implemented for defining clinical and pathological staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15195788     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.54.3.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  76 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel node biopsy in melanoma: technical considerations of the procedure as performed at the John Wayne Cancer Institute.

Authors:  Sanjay P Bagaria; Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Interval sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma: a digital pathology analysis of Ki67 expression and microvascular density.

Authors:  Christian Marinaccio; Giuseppe Giudice; Eleonora Nacchiero; Fabio Robusto; Giuseppina Opinto; Gaetano Lastilla; Eugenio Maiorano; Domenico Ribatti
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Maiko Wada-Ohno; Takamichi Ito; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-24

Review 4.  Melanoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Terry A Day; Joshua D Hornig; Anand K Sharma; Frank Brescia; M Boyd Gillespie; Deanne Lathers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-01

5.  Melanoma survival in the United States, 1992 to 2005.

Authors:  Lori A Pollack; Jun Li; Zahava Berkowitz; Hannah K Weir; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Umed A Ajani; Donatus U Ekwueme; Chunyu Li; Brian P Pollack
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Relationships among primary tumor size, number of involved nodes, and survival for 8044 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jayasri G Iyer; Barry E Storer; Kelly G Paulson; Bianca Lemos; Jerri Linn Phillips; Christopher K Bichakjian; Nathalie Zeitouni; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Vernon Sondak; Clark C Otley; Siegrid S Yu; Timothy M Johnson; Nanette J Liegeois; David Byrd; Arthur Sober; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Randomized controlled trial of a sun protection intervention for children of melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Mary K Tripp; Susan K Peterson; Alexander V Prokhorov; Sanjay S Shete; Diana L Urbauer; Bryan M Fellman; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Prognostication in eye cancer: the latest tumor, node, metastasis classification and beyond.

Authors:  T Kivelä; E Kujala
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Peptide-targeted radionuclide therapy for melanoma.

Authors:  Yubin Miao; Thomas P Quinn
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Multiple murine BRaf(V600E) melanoma cell lines with sensitivity to PLX4032.

Authors:  Molly H Jenkins; Shannon M Steinberg; Matthew P Alexander; Jan L Fisher; Marc S Ernstoff; Mary Jo Turk; David W Mullins; Constance E Brinckerhoff
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.