Literature DB >> 15195319

Odds ratios for a continuous outcome variable without dichotomizing.

Barry Kurt Moser1, Laura P Coombs.   

Abstract

The loss of information from dichotomizing a continuous outcome is well documented in the literature. One advantage of dichotomizing is that it allows estimation of odds ratio parameters through a logistic regression analysis. The objective of this paper is to develop a new estimator of the same odds ratio parameters through regression analysis on the original continuous outcome without the inherent loss of information caused by dichotomizing. Through a mathematical, asymptotic development the relative sample sizes required to attain a specified power when testing the odds ratio parameter are compared for the dichotomizing procedure and the proposed approach. The comparison highlights the substantial sample size savings attained by the proposed approach, particularly for large values of the odds ratio parameter and for small proportions of dichotomized successes or failures. In a Monte Carlo simulation the variances and absolute biases of the two odds ratio estimators and the length of their respective confidence intervals again demonstrate the improvement attained by the proposed approach. In addition, coverage probabilities of the confidence intervals of the proposed approach converge quickly to the nominal levels. The cost savings due to the reduction in required sample size when using this method make it a very attractive study design and analysis tool for medical researchers. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15195319     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Let continuous outcome variables remain continuous.

Authors:  Enayatollah Bakhshi; Brian McArdle; Kazem Mohammad; Behjat Seifi; Akbar Biglarian
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Richard Jenkinson; Peter C Austin; Ruth Croxford; David Wasserstein; Benjamin Escott; J Michael Paterson; Hans Kreder; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-05-23

3.  Circulating CD40 and sCD40L Predict Changes in Renal Function in Subjects with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey X Xie; Helen Alderson; James Ritchie; Philip A Kalra; Yanmei Xie; Kaili Ren; Hanh Nguyen; Tian Chen; Pamela Brewster; Rajesh Gupta; Lance D Dworkin; Deepak Malhotra; Christopher J Cooper; Jiang Tian; Steven T Haller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Using marginal standardisation to estimate relative risk without dichotomising continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Yilin Ning; Shih Ling Kao; Nathalie C Støer; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Kavita Venkataraman; Eric Yin Hao Khoo; E-Shyong Tai; Chuen Seng Tan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  A comparison of two methods for estimating odds ratios: results from the National Health Survey.

Authors:  Enayatollah Bakhshi; Mohammad R Eshraghian; Kazem Mohammad; Behjat Seifi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection in cattle in Northern Ireland: a large-scale epidemiological investigation utilising surveillance data.

Authors:  Andrew W Byrne; Stewart McBride; Angela Lahuerta-Marin; Maria Guelbenzu; Jim McNair; Robin A Skuce; Stanley W J McDowell
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Odds ratios from logistic, geometric, Poisson, and negative binomial regression models.

Authors:  Christopher J Sroka; Haikady N Nagaraja
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.