Literature DB >> 15194514

Predicting anxiety in magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Lynne M Harris1, Steven R Cumming, Ross G Menzies.   

Abstract

This study evaluated a brief screening instrument for predicting psychological distress in patients undertaking magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The scale is adapted from Wolpe and Lang's (1964) Fear Survey Schedule (FSS; see Lukins, Davan, & Drummond, 1997). Noise and/or confinement were identified as the most unpleasant feature of the MRI by 48.3% of 118 outpatients. The MRI-FSS (Lukins et al., 1997; 9 items) significantly predicted the number of panic attack symptoms and state anxiety experienced during MRI scan better than a range of other measures. There was a significant increase in MRI-FSS scores from prescan to postscan among those who experienced high levels of anxiety during the scan. The MRI-FSS appears to be a useful indicator of likely adverse psychological reactions in the MRI scan that is sensitive to the sequelae of the MRI procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194514     DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1101_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  12 in total

1.  A cognitive behavioural approach to preventing anxiety during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Lukins; I G Davan; P D Drummond
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06

2.  Anxiety and panic during magnetic resonance scans.

Authors:  S C Brennan; W H Redd; P B Jacobsen; O Schorr; R T Heelan; G K Sze; G Krol; B E Peters; J K Morrissey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Long-term claustrophobia following magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; M Goldberg; E Labbé; D Zacher; R Steele-Rosomoff; H Rosomoff
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow-up.

Authors:  L C Kilborn; E E Labbé
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1990-08

5.  Evidence for fear of restriction and fear of suffocation as components of claustrophobia.

Authors:  L M Harris; J Robinson; R G Menzies
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1999-02

6.  Claustrophobia during MR imaging.

Authors:  R B Granet; L J Gelber
Journal:  N J Med       Date:  1990-06

Review 7.  Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  J C Meléndez; E McCrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories.

Authors:  P F Lovibond; S H Lovibond
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1995-03

9.  Claustrophobia and the magnetic resonance imaging procedure.

Authors:  H K McIsaac; D S Thordarson; R Shafran; S Rachman; G Poole
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-06

10.  Patients' perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R MacKenzie; C Sims; R G Owens; A K Dixon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Do P M Tromp; Melissa D Stockbridge; Claire M Kaplan; Rachael M Tillman; Andrew S Fox
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Whole-body MRI compared with standard pathways for staging metastatic disease in lung and colorectal cancer: the Streamline diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Susan Mallett; Anne Miles; Stephen Morris; Laura Quinn; Caroline S Clarke; Sandy Beare; John Bridgewater; Vicky Goh; Sam Janes; Dow-Mu Koh; Alison Morton; Neal Navani; Alfred Oliver; Anwar Padhani; Shonit Punwani; Andrea Rockall; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Predictors of unsuccessful magnetic resonance imaging scanning in older generalized anxiety disorder patients and controls.

Authors:  Jan Mohlman; Dana A Eldreth; Rebecca B Price; Daniel Chazin; Dorie A Glover
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 4.  Anxiety, respiration, and cerebral blood flow: implications for functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas D Giardino; Seth D Friedman; Stephen R Dager
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.735

5.  Evaluation of the Aggregated Time Savings in Adopting Fast Brain MRI Techniques for Outpatient Brain MRI.

Authors:  Min Lang; Samuel Cartmell; Azadeh Tabari; Daniel Briggs; Oleg Pianykh; John Kirsch; Stephen Cauley; Wei-Ching Lo; Seretha Risacher; Augusto Goncalves Filho; Marc D Succi; Otto Rapalino; Pamela Schaefer; John Conklin; Susie Y Huang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Pinpointing moments of high anxiety during an MRI examination.

Authors:  Daisy van Minde; Laura Klaming; Hans Weda
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  Preliminary observations regarding the expectations, acceptability and satisfaction of whole-body MRI in self-referring asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Derna Busacchio; Ketti Mazzocco; Sara Gandini; Paola Pricolo; Marianna Masiero; Paul Eugene Summers; Grabriella Pravettoni; Giuseppe Petralia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Audio-guided self-hypnosis for reduction of claustrophobia during MR imaging: results of an observational 2-group study.

Authors:  Adriane E Napp; Torsten Diekhoff; Olf Stoiber; Judith Enders; Gerd Diederichs; Peter Martus; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The effect of patient anxiety and depression on motion during myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Vassiliki Lyra; Maria Kallergi; Emmanouil Rizos; Georgios Lamprakopoulos; Sofia N Chatziioannou
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ruth Evans; Stuart Taylor; Sam Janes; Steve Halligan; Alison Morton; Neal Navani; Alf Oliver; Andrea Rockall; Jonathan Teague; Anne Miles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.