BACKGROUND: Appropriate donor selection is one of the keys for successful human islet isolation. Previous studies identified several critical donor factors; however, significant improvements in current human islet isolation protocols make reevaluation of donor factors necessary. STUDY DESIGN: Review was performed on 31 human islet isolations. Islet isolations were conducted using the standard automated islet isolation method with three protocol revisions that included the two-layer method (TLM) of pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation, usage of purified collagenase mixture Liberase, and continuous density gradient for islet purification. Factors leading to successful isolations (islet yield > 100,000 IE and static incubation stimulation index greater than 2.0) were analyzed. The impacts of various risk factors were also examined. RESULTS: Donors in the successful islet isolation group had a significantly lower incidence of elevated peak transaminases and creatinine levels, lower usage of norepinephrine or cardiac arrest, less prolonged hospitalization (> 96 hours), and less prolonged preservation time of donor pancreata (>25 hours). The TLM extended acceptable preservation time of donor pancreata from 8 to 25 hours. When donors had no risk factor, the success rate was 14/16 (87.5%). In sharp contrast, when donors had two or more risk factors, the success rate was 0/7 (0%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for human islet isolation with the current islet isolation protocol were identified. The decision to process pancreata based on review of donor factors should improve the consistency of human islet isolations and transplantation for curing type 1 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate donor selection is one of the keys for successful human islet isolation. Previous studies identified several critical donor factors; however, significant improvements in current human islet isolation protocols make reevaluation of donor factors necessary. STUDY DESIGN: Review was performed on 31 human islet isolations. Islet isolations were conducted using the standard automated islet isolation method with three protocol revisions that included the two-layer method (TLM) of pancreas preservation prior to islet isolation, usage of purified collagenase mixture Liberase, and continuous density gradient for islet purification. Factors leading to successful isolations (islet yield > 100,000 IE and static incubation stimulation index greater than 2.0) were analyzed. The impacts of various risk factors were also examined. RESULTS: Donors in the successful islet isolation group had a significantly lower incidence of elevated peak transaminases and creatinine levels, lower usage of norepinephrine or cardiac arrest, less prolonged hospitalization (> 96 hours), and less prolonged preservation time of donor pancreata (>25 hours). The TLM extended acceptable preservation time of donor pancreata from 8 to 25 hours. When donors had no risk factor, the success rate was 14/16 (87.5%). In sharp contrast, when donors had two or more risk factors, the success rate was 0/7 (0%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for human islet isolation with the current islet isolation protocol were identified. The decision to process pancreata based on review of donor factors should improve the consistency of human islet isolations and transplantation for curing type 1 diabetes.
Authors: Ling-Jia Wang; Tatsuya Kin; Doug O'Gorman; A M James Shapiro; Bashoo Naziruddin; Morihito Takita; Marlon F Levy; Andrew M Posselt; Gregory L Szot; Omid Savari; Barbara Barbaro; James McGarrigle; Chun Chieh Yeh; Jose Oberholzer; Ji Lei; Tao Chen; Moh Lian; James F Markmann; Alejandro Alvarez; Elina Linetsky; Camillo Ricordi; A N Balamurugan; Gopalakrishnan Loganathan; Joshua J Wilhelm; Bernhard J Hering; Rita Bottino; Massimo Trucco; Chengyang Liu; Zaw Min; Yanjing Li; Ali Naji; Luis A Fernandez; Martynas Ziemelis; Juan S Danobeitia; J Michael Millis; Piotr Witkowski Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Joana Ferrer; William E Scott; Bradley P Weegman; Thomas M Suszynski; David E R Sutherland; Bernhard J Hering; Klearchos K Papas Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: P Andrades; C K Asiedu; B Gansuvd; S Inusah; K J Goodwin; L A Deckard; U Jargal; J M Thomas Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Y Wang; K K Danielson; A Ropski; T Harvat; B Barbaro; D Paushter; M Qi; J Oberholzer Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Ahmed A Arzouni; Andreia Vargas-Seymour; Nance Nardi; Aileen J F King; Peter M Jones Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Ju Yun Oh; Yang Hee Kim; Song Lee; Yu Na Lee; Han Se Go; Dae Wook Hwang; Ki Byung Song; Jae Hoon Lee; Woohyung Lee; Seongjun So; Eunju Kang; Eunsung Jun; In Kyong Shim; Song Cheol Kim Journal: Cells Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 7.666