Can the use of marginal liver donors change recipient survival rate?

Liver transplantation as a therapeutic method for the treatment of end-stage liver disease is beclouded by a scarcity of organs. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the relation between the classification of donors as marginal versus ideal and recipients survival after 148 of 197 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT) performed from 1991 to 2001. Donors were classified as marginal if they showed the major criteria of: age over 55 years, aspartate aminotransferase greater than 150 UI/L; serum bilirubin greater than 2 mg/dL, serum sodium greater 150 mEq/L, high-dose dopamine or any other vasoactive amine, cardiac arrest, intensive care unit (ICU) stay over 5 days, and moderate severe macrosteatosis. The minor criteria for a marginal donor were: use of dopamine below 10 microg/kg/min, history of alcoholism, drug abuse, ICU stays less than 4 days, microsteatosis of any degree, and mild macrosteatosis. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox regression analyzing and the Kaplan-Meier survival method. The rate of marginal donors was 61.5%. The 180 postoperative day survival was 77.0%. Survival rates were 81.1% for recipients of marginal donor organs, and 70.7% for ideal donor recipients (P >.05). In conclusion, the use of marginal liver donors is viable and safely expands the numbers of liver transplants, thereby diminishing the number of waiting list deaths.