Literature DB >> 15194299

Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies.

M C R Castro1, L M P Araujo, W C Nahas, S Arap, E David-Neto, L E Ianhez.   

Abstract

To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P <.005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P =.02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P =.001). When analyzing PRA >50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P =.02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P =.08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194299     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplantations, with a focus on three induction therapies.

Authors:  Eun Sung Jeong; Kyo Won Lee; Sang Jin Kim; Hee Jin Yoo; Kyung A Kim; Jae Berm Park
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-31

2.  Lifetime cost-effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after de novo renal transplantation.

Authors:  Stephanie R Earnshaw; Christopher N Graham; William D Irish; Reiko Sato; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Heterogeneity of induction therapy in Spain: changing patterns according to year, centre, indications and results.

Authors:  Emilio Rodrigo; Gema Fernández-Fresnedo; Carmen Robledo; Rosa Palomar; Carmen Cantarell; Auxiliadora Mazuecos; Antonio Osuna; Alicia Mendiluce; Antonio Alarcón; Manuel Arias
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2010-06

4.  Early outcomes of thymoglobulin and basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation: application of statistical approaches to reduce bias in observational comparisons.

Authors:  Lisa M Willoughby; Mark A Schnitzler; Daniel C Brennan; Brett W Pinsky; Nino Dzebisashvili; Paula M Buchanan; Luca Neri; Lisa A Rocca-Rey; Kevin C Abbott; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of antithymocyte globulin induction: use of integrated national registry data to achieve ten-year follow-up of 10-10 Study participants.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.