Literature DB >> 15194206

Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and cocaine: asymmetric generalization.

Nantaka Khorana1, Manik R Pullagurla, Richard Young, Richard A Glennon.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that +/- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and psychostimulants produce similar but non-identical stimulus effects in animals. To examine this hypothesis, groups of rats were trained to discriminate either MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) or cocaine (8 mg/kg) from saline vehicle using a two-lever operant procedure under a variable interval (VI) 15 s schedule of reinforcement. Once the animals were trained, tests of stimulus generalization were conducted with +/- MDMA, cocaine, S+ MDMA, and R- MDMA. As previously demonstrated, both S+ MDMA and R- MDMA (ED50 = 0.8 and 1.2 mg/kg, respectively) substituted for +/- MDMA. Stimulus generalization also occurred upon administration of cocaine (ED50 = 4.6 mg/kg) to the +/- MDMA-trained animals. In the cocaine-trained animals, however, stimulus generalization did not occur to +/- MDMA, S+ MDMA nor R- MDMA. Receptor binding profiles for MDMA and cocaine were compared in an effort to identify any novel and common receptor-based mechanism(s) to explain stimulus generalization of MDMA-trained animals to the effects of cocaine, but only their actions on neurotransmitter transporters seem applicable. Taken together, the results indicate that stimulus substitution between MDMA and cocaine is asymmetric and suggest that although similarities exist between the stimulus actions of MDMA and cocaine, differences might be explained by their differential effects on increasing synaptic concentrations of serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and/or norepinephrine (NE).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15194206     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  12 in total

1.  A reliable model of intravenous MDMA self-administration in naïve mice.

Authors:  José Manuel Trigo; Fany Panayi; Guadalupe Soria; Rafael Maldonado; Patricia Robledo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.

Authors:  Daniel Kueh; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Evaluation of training dose in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 4-methylmethcathinone.

Authors:  Michael D Berquist; Nathyn A Thompson; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine, cathinone, methamphetamine, and their 3,4-methylenedioxy analogs in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Douglas A Smith; Bruce E Blough; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  An in vivo microdialysis assessment of concurrent MDMA and cocaine administration in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  John J Panos; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  N-Methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (PMMA) and N-Methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA) produce non-identical discriminative stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Richard A Glennon; Richard Young; Małgorzata Dukat; Jean Chang-Fong; Mohamed El-Zahabi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of dimethyltryptamine with different classes of psychoactive compounds in rats.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Margaret A Rutledge; Theresa Carbonaro; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  S(-)Propranolol as a discriminative stimulus and its comparison to the stimulus effects of cocaine in rats.

Authors:  Richard Young; Richard A Glennon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Locomotor, discriminative stimulus, and place conditioning effects of MDAI in rodents.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Sean B Dolan; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 10.  Relevance of rodent models of intravenous MDMA self-administration to human MDMA consumption patterns.

Authors:  R De La Garza; K R Fabrizio; A Gupta
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.