Literature DB >> 15193786

Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.

N J M Opdam1, B A C Loomans, F J M Roeters, E M Bronkhorst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the survival over a five-year period of posterior resin composite restorations placed by students.
METHODS: Class I and II resin composite restorations placed by second-fourth year dental students were evaluated. Patients attended the dental school every 6 months for a regular check-up during which all restorations were checked on their clinical acceptability. In case of replacement or repair of a restoration, this was registered in the patient's record. From each record the survival time and reasons for failure of resin composite restorations were gathered.
RESULTS: Seven-hundred three posterior resin composite restorations in 382 patients (49% female and 51% male, age 22-78) were evaluated. At 5 years 560 of the 703 restorations were still considered to be "clinically acceptable". Forty-nine restorations were considered as "functionally present", of which 44 were restored with a crown and four had received a new restoration adjacent to the existing restoration without its removal. Ninety-four restorations had failed. The main reasons for failure were restoration fracture, caries, endodontic treatment, defective margin and lack of proximal contact. The survival rate of the restorations was 87% at 5 years, resulting in an annual failure rate of 2.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Dental students are able to place resin composite restorations in posterior teeth with an acceptable mean annual failure rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193786     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  18 in total

1.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Evaluating the Marginal Integrity of Bulk Fill Fibre Reinforced Composites in Bio-mimetically Restored Tooth.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Patnana; V Narsimha Rao Vanga; Srinivas Kumar Chandrabhatla
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Advancing Discontinuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites above Critical Length for Replacing Current Dental Composites and Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2017-02

4.  Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  EC Dent Sci       Date:  2017-05-02

Review 5.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Azam Bakhshandeh; Vibeke Qvist; Kim R Ekstrand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials.

Authors:  Saba Tohidkhah; Hamid Kermanshah; Elham Ahmadi; Behnous Jalalian; Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review.

Authors:  Arvind Shenoy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

9.  A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Jan W V van Dijken; Jette Halken; Anna-Lena Hallonsten; Ruth Höigaard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Characterization of methacrylate-based composites containing thio-urethane oligomers.

Authors:  Atais Bacchi; Morgan Nelson; Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.