OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the histologic findings of 30 patients with a diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) based on established clinical and instrumental criteria, who did not have a family history of ARVD. BACKGROUND: The diagnostic role of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in patients with a clinical profile of ARVD is still debated. METHODS: Thirty patients (19 male, 11 female, mean age 27 +/- 10 years) with left bundle branch block morphology ventricular tachyarrhythmias and echocardiographic, angiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings diagnostic of ARVD were studied. All patients, besides diagnostic, noninvasive, and invasive cardiac studies, underwent EMB in the apex, anterior free wall, inferior wall of the right ventricle (RV) and in the septal-apical region of the left ventricle. RESULTS: Diagnostic histologic features of ARVD were found only in 9 (30%) patients and a myocarditis, according to the Dallas criteria, in the remaining 21 (70%) patients. Morphometric evaluation of RV samples showed significant differences in fatty tissue and myocyte percent area between ARVD and myocarditis (p < 0.001). Conversely, no difference was found between the two groups in arrhythmic patterns and structural and functional echocardiographic, angiographic, and MRI RV alterations. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense signals in 67% of ARVD and in 62% of myocarditis group (p = NS). During follow-up (mean, 23 +/- 14 months), all patients with myocarditis remained stable on antiarrhythmic therapy while five patients with ARVD required implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. CONCLUSIONS: A myocarditis involving the RV can mimic ARVD. An EMB appears the most reliable diagnostic technique, with significant prognostic and therapeutic implications.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the histologic findings of 30 patients with a diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) based on established clinical and instrumental criteria, who did not have a family history of ARVD. BACKGROUND: The diagnostic role of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in patients with a clinical profile of ARVD is still debated. METHODS: Thirty patients (19 male, 11 female, mean age 27 +/- 10 years) with left bundle branch block morphology ventricular tachyarrhythmias and echocardiographic, angiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings diagnostic of ARVD were studied. All patients, besides diagnostic, noninvasive, and invasive cardiac studies, underwent EMB in the apex, anterior free wall, inferior wall of the right ventricle (RV) and in the septal-apical region of the left ventricle. RESULTS: Diagnostic histologic features of ARVD were found only in 9 (30%) patients and a myocarditis, according to the Dallas criteria, in the remaining 21 (70%) patients. Morphometric evaluation of RV samples showed significant differences in fatty tissue and myocyte percent area between ARVD and myocarditis (p < 0.001). Conversely, no difference was found between the two groups in arrhythmic patterns and structural and functional echocardiographic, angiographic, and MRI RV alterations. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense signals in 67% of ARVD and in 62% of myocarditis group (p = NS). During follow-up (mean, 23 +/- 14 months), all patients with myocarditis remained stable on antiarrhythmic therapy while five patients with ARVD required implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. CONCLUSIONS:A myocarditis involving the RV can mimic ARVD. An EMB appears the most reliable diagnostic technique, with significant prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Authors: Ruzica Maksimović; Okan Ekinci; Christian Reiner; Georg F Bachmann; Petar M Seferović; Arsen D Ristić; Christian W Hamm; Heinz-F Pitschner; Thorsten Dill Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Frank I Marcus; Wojciech Zareba; Hugh Calkins; Jeffrey A Towbin; Cristina Basso; David A Bluemke; N A Mark Estes; Michael H Picard; Danita Sanborn; Gaetano Thiene; Thomas Wichter; David Cannom; David J Wilber; Melvin Scheinman; Henry Duff; James Daubert; Mario Talajic; Andrew Krahn; Michael Sweeney; Hasan Garan; Scott Sakaguchi; Bruce B Lerman; Charles Kerr; Jack Kron; Jonathan S Steinberg; Duane Sherrill; Kathleen Gear; Mary Brown; Patricia Severski; Slava Polonsky; Scott McNitt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: C Pandozi; Marco Valerio Mariani; C Chimenti; V Maestrini; D Filomena; M Magnocavallo; M Straito; A Piro; M Russo; M Galeazzi; S Ficili; F Colivicchi; P Severino; M Mancone; F Fedele; C Lavalle Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Aimé Bonny; Nicolas Lellouche; Ivo Ditah; Françoise Hidden-Lucet; Martial T Yitemben; Benjamin Granger; Fabrice Larrazet; Robert Frank; Guy Fontaine Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 1.866