Literature DB >> 15193617

fMRI correlates of the episodic retrieval of emotional contexts.

A P R Smith1, R N A Henson, R J Dolan, M D Rugg.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies reveal differences in neural correlates of the retrieval of emotional and nonemotional memories. In the present experiment, encoding of emotionally neutral pictures in association with positively, neutrally or negatively valenced background contexts led to differential modulation of neural activity elicited in a subsequent recognition memory test for these pictures. Recognition of stimuli previously studied in emotional compared to neutral contexts elicited enhanced activity in structures previously implicated in episodic memory, including the parahippocampal cortex, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. In addition, there was engagement of structures linked more specifically to emotional processing, including the amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. These emotion-related effects displayed both valence-independent and valence-specific components. We discuss the findings in terms of current models of emotional memory retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193617     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  80 in total

1.  Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Previously reappraised: the lasting effect of description type on picture-elicited electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Annmarie Macnamara; Kevin N Ochsner; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Binding neutral information to emotional contexts: Brain dynamics of long-term recognition memory.

Authors:  Carlos Ventura-Bort; Andreas Löw; Julia Wendt; Javier Moltó; Rosario Poy; Florin Dolcos; Alfons O Hamm; Mathias Weymar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandino; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; Suzanne L Pendl; Colin J Humphries; William L Gross; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Age-related changes in repetition suppression of neural activity during emotional future simulation.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Preston P Thakral; Karl Szpunar; Donna Rose Addis; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 7.  The slow forgetting of emotional episodic memories: an emotional binding account.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Maureen Ritchey
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality.

Authors:  Tetsuo Koyama; John G McHaffie; Paul J Laurienti; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modulation of retrieval processing reflects accuracy of emotional source memory.

Authors:  Adam P R Smith; Richard N A Henson; Michael D Rugg; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Multivoxel pattern analysis reveals increased memory targeting and reduced use of retrieved details during single-agenda source monitoring.

Authors:  Susan G R McDuff; Hillary C Frankel; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.