Literature DB >> 15193544

Ex vivo gene therapy-induced endochondral bone formation: comparison of muscle-derived stem cells and different subpopulations of primary muscle-derived cells.

Hsain-Chung Shen1, Hairong Peng, Arvydas Usas, Brian Gearhart, James Cummins, Freddie H Fu, Johnny Huard.   

Abstract

Muscle-based gene therapy and tissue engineering hold great promise for improving bone healing. However, the relative advantage of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) or primary muscle-derived cells (MDCs) remains to be defined. We compared the ability of MDSCs and different subpopulations of MDCs (PP1 and PP3) to induce bone formation via ex vivo gene therapy. We were able to efficiently transduce the MDSCs and all the other evaluated populations of MDCs (efficiency of transduction = approximately 80%) by using a retroviral vector expressing human bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4). All the transduced cell populations secreted high levels of BMP4 (140-300 ng/10(6) cells/24 h), but the MDSCs differentiated toward the osteogenic lineage more effectively than did the other muscle cell populations, as indicated by the expression of alkaline phosphatase, an early osteogenic marker. von Kossa staining indicated that mineralized bone formed as early as 7 days after implantation of any of the BMP4-expressing cell populations into immunocompetent syngeneic mice; however, MDSCs expressing BMP4 produced significantly more bone than did the other MDC populations, as evidenced by both histomorphometry and biochemical analysis. Further investigation revealed that MDSCs expressing BMP4 persisted for a significantly longer period of time at the bone forming sites than did the other BMP4-expressing MDC populations. Additionally, MDSCs expressing BMP4 triggered a smaller infiltration of CD4 lymphocytes within the bone forming areas than did the other MDC populations expressing BMP4. Finally, we demonstrated that MDSCs expressing BMP4 can heal a critical-sized skull bone defect in immunocompetent mice. In summary, this study shows that MDSCs are better than primary MDCs for use as cellular vehicles in BMP4-based ex vivo gene therapy to improve bone healing. The advantage of MDSCs may be attributable, at least in part, to their lower immunogenicity and higher capacity for in vivo survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193544     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  15 in total

1.  Effect of host sex and sex hormones on muscle-derived stem cell-mediated bone formation and defect healing.

Authors:  Laura B Meszaros; Arvydas Usas; Gregory M Cooper; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Muscle-derived stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative therapy.

Authors:  Arvydas Usas; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science.

Authors:  Céline Colnot
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Role of donor and host cells in muscle-derived stem cell-mediated bone repair: differentiation vs. paracrine effects.

Authors:  Xueqin Gao; Arvydas Usas; Jonathan D Proto; Aiping Lu; James H Cummins; Alexander Proctor; Chien-Wen Chen; Johnny Huard
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Impact of tissue-specific stem cells on lineage-specific differentiation: a focus on the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Tyler Pizzute; Kevin Lynch; Ming Pei
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 via coacervate improves the osteogenic potential of muscle-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Hongshuai Li; Noah Ray Johnson; Arvydas Usas; Aiping Lu; Minakshi Poddar; Yadong Wang; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Gene Therapy for Bone Repair Using Human Cells: Superior Osteogenic Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-Transduced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adipose Tissue Compared to Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Sofia Bougioukli; Osamu Sugiyama; William Pannell; Brandon Ortega; Matthew H Tan; Amy H Tang; Robert Yoho; Daniel A Oakes; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 9.  Gene therapy: design and prospects for craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  E L Scheller; P H Krebsbach
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Ex vivo-transduced autologous skin fibroblasts expressing human Lim mineralization protein-3 efficiently form new bone in animal models.

Authors:  W Lattanzi; C Parrilla; A Fetoni; G Logroscino; G Straface; G Pecorini; E Stigliano; A Tampieri; R Bedini; R Pecci; F Michetti; A Gambotto; P D Robbins; E Pola
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.