Literature DB >> 15193397

Vaccine adjuvant: it makes the difference.

Karla M Lima1, Sandra Aparecida dos Santos, José M Rodrigues, Célio L Silva.   

Abstract

The use of protein or DNA in vaccination process rather than living or attenuated microorganism, aims at the increase of the vaccines safety. However, in these cases, the use of adjuvant is frequently required to improve their immunogenicity. In this study, we show the importance of the adjuvant in a vaccine formulation. Vaccines for tuberculosis provide an instructive example, based on the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (hsp65). The same antigen can elicit completely different patterns of immune response depending on how it is administered. Thus, the same antigen might or not protect mice from challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, depending on the formulation. These data suggest that, despite the name, the adjuvant plays a fundamental role on the vaccination process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193397     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  13 in total

1.  A recombinant aspartyl protease of Coccidioides posadasii induces protection against pulmonary coccidioidomycosis in mice.

Authors:  Eric J Tarcha; Venkatesha Basrur; Chiung-Yu Hung; Malcolm J Gardner; Garry T Cole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Preparation of Modified Konjac Glucomannan Nanoparticles and their Application as Vaccine Adjuvants to Promote Ovalbumin-Induced Immune Response in Mice.

Authors:  Na Chen; Pei Zhu; Ting Du; Kai Han; Dang Wang; Jianfeng Ye; Shaobo Xiao; Xiaozhou Ye; Yun Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Emerging nanotechnologies for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-04

4.  Vaccine Development Against Leishmania donovani.

Authors:  Amrita Das; Nahid Ali
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Comparison of different delivery systems of DNA vaccination for the induction of protection against tuberculosis in mice and guinea pigs.

Authors:  Lúcia de Paula; Célio L Silva; Daniela Carlos; Camila Matias-Peres; Carlos A Sorgi; Edson G Soares; Patrícia R M Souza; Carlos R Z Bladés; Fábio C S Galleti; Vânia L D Bonato; Eduardo D C Gonçalves; Erika V G Silva; Lúcia H Faccioli
Journal:  Genet Vaccines Ther       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 6.  Vaccine Candidates against Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: a Review

Authors:  Ava Behrouzi; Fatemeh Rahimi-Jamnani; Seyed Davar Siadat
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Oral immunization of mice with Omp31-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles induces high protection against Brucella melitensis infection.

Authors:  Morteza Abkar; Mahdi Fasihi-Ramandi; Hamid Kooshki; Abbas Sahebghadam Lotfi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-12-13

8.  Detection and molecular characterization of porcine parvovirus in fetal tissues from sows without reproductive failure in Argentina.

Authors:  M S Serena; J A Cappuccio; G E Metz; C G Aspitia; M Dibárbora; M Gallo Calderón; M G Echeverría
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-22

9.  G2 Dendrimer as a Carrier Can Enhance Immune Responses Against HCV-NS3 Protein in BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Foozieh Javadi; Pooneh Rahimi; Mohammad Hossien Modarresi; Azam Bolhassani; Mehdi Shafiee Ardestani; Seyed Mehdi Sadat
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Immunotherapeutic Activities of a DNA Plasmid Carrying the Mycobacterial hsp65 Gene (DNAhsp65).

Authors:  Celio Lopes Silva; Thiago Malardo; Aline Seiko Carvalho Tahyra
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2020-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.