Literature DB >> 15193382

Mucosal (SIgA) and serum (IgG) immunologic responses in young adults following intranasal administration of one or two doses of inactivated, trivalent anti-influenza vaccine.

Evgenia Greenbaum1, Dan Engelhard, Reuven Levy, Miriam Schlezinger, Avraham Morag, Zichria Zakay-Rones.   

Abstract

Influenza morbidity affects the entire population and has an enormous impact upon the economic burden and the health care systems. Available vaccines are often unsatisfactory and many individuals are reluctant to receive injections. Intranasal immunization is painless, side effect free and may encourage a large number of individuals to participate in the vaccination programs. Ninety-two students were immunized intranasally once or twice, 21 days apart, with a trivalent inactivated whole influenza vaccine during three separate seasons (1996/1997, 1997/1998 and 1998/1999) with the recommended seasonal strains. The vaccine was well tolerated, without adverse effect and morbidity in the vaccinees during the winter season was low. Serum antibody response was determined by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test and nasal response by the enzyme-linked immunoadsorbant assay (ELISA). Following the second dose, mucosal antibody response was detected in 48.1-73.3% of immunized subjects. Serum and mucosal antibody levels (GMT) increased significantly to all the strains, with the exception of A/H3N2 in the mucosal response in 1997/1998. At the end of the trial, the percentage of immune subjects was over 93% to A/H1N1 strains, 60-71% to A/H3N2 and 64-66% to B/Harbin in 1996/1997 and 1997/1998, and 75-91% following one dose in 1998/1999. When serum and mucosal responses were combined, a higher percentage of responders was found (60-86%). Repeated vaccination does not seem to interfere with serum or mucosal response. The double barrier of mucosal and serum antibody may inhibit infection and decrease morbidity when infection occurs, thus limiting the spread of influenza in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193382     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  15 in total

1.  A dose-response evaluation of inactivated influenza vaccine given intranasally and intramuscularly to healthy young adults.

Authors:  Robert L Atmar; Wendy A Keitel; Thomas R Cate; Flor M Munoz; Fred Ruben; Robert B Couch
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Intranasal DNA vaccination induces potent mucosal and systemic immune responses and cross-protective immunity against influenza viruses.

Authors:  Lea Torrieri-Dramard; Bénédicte Lambrecht; Helena Lage Ferreira; Thierry Van den Berg; David Klatzmann; Bertrand Bellier
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Contrasting effects of type I interferon as a mucosal adjuvant for influenza vaccine in mice and humans.

Authors:  Robert B Couch; Robert L Atmar; Thomas R Cate; John M Quarles; Wendy A Keitel; Nancy H Arden; Janet Wells; Diane Niño; Philip R Wyde
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Effects of the Sijunzi decoction on the immunological function in rats with dextran sulfate-induced ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Wangui Yu; Bing Lu; Hengwen Zhang; Yanxiang Zhang; Jin Yan
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-05-16

5.  Elevated frequency of gamma interferon-producing NK cells in healthy adults vaccinated against influenza virus.

Authors:  Brian R Long; Jakob Michaelsson; Christopher P Loo; Wassim M Ballan; Bien-Aimee N Vu; Frederick M Hecht; Lewis L Lanier; Joan M Chapman; Douglas F Nixon
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-11-14

Review 6.  Immunological assessment of influenza vaccines and immune correlates of protection.

Authors:  Adrian Reber; Jacqueline Katz
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.217

7.  The effect of giving influenza vaccination to general practitioners: a controlled trial [NCT00221676].

Authors:  Barbara Michiels; Hilde Philips; Samuel Coenen; Fernande Yane; Toon Steinhauser; Sofie Stuyck; Joke Denekens; Paul Van Royen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Intranasal delivery of influenza subunit vaccine formulated with GEM particles as an adjuvant.

Authors:  Vinay Saluja; Jean P Amorij; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Kees Leenhouts; Anke Huckriede; Wouter L J Hinrichs; Henderik W Frijlink
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Hideki Hasegawa; Takeshi Ichinohe; Akira Ainai; Shin-Ichi Tamura; Takeshi Kurata
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Intranasal vaccination with an inactivated whole influenza virus vaccine induces strong antibody responses in serum and nasal mucus of healthy adults.

Authors:  Akira Ainai; Shin-Ichi Tamura; Tadaki Suzuki; Elly van Riet; Ryo Ito; Takato Odagiri; Masato Tashiro; Takeshi Kurata; Hideki Hasegawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.